“…The molecular basis for why the OSE is so highly prone to transformation is not understood, but because the major risk factors for the disease are age, menopause, ovarian function and genetics (Sueblinvong and Carney, 2009), it would appear that a woman's natural biology places these cells at risk. A considerable body of data from human tissues, cell culture experiments and animal studies provides rationale for how these factors may promote EOC: (i) the frequency of premalignant inclusion cysts correlates positively with age and the total number of ovulations a woman experiences (Westhoff et al, 1993;Heller et al, 2005;Tan et al, 2005); (ii) progestins can induce OSE apoptosis in vivo (Rodriguez et al, 2002); (iii) cultured OSE and ovarian cancer cells respond to high concentrations of estradiol and progesterone (E and P) by growth arrest and up-regulation of apoptotic indicators (Keith Bechtel and Bonavida, 2001;Wright et al, 2005), or by increased proliferation in vivo (Bai et al, 2000); (iv) gonadotrophins that regulate ovarian function can promote proliferation in cultured OSE cells and in vivo (Davies et al, 1999;Ivarsson et al, 2001;Parrott et al, 2001); (v) ovulation is accompanied by wound/inflammatory processes that are genotoxic (Gubbay et al, 2005;Rae and Hillier, 2005;Fegan et al, 2008); (vi) prior to ovulation, ovarian factors inflict genetic damage and death on the OSE (Colgin and Murdoch, 1997;Murdoch et al, 2001;Murdoch and Martinchick, 2004), whereas after ovulation, increased proliferation in the OSE has been detected (Osterholzer et al, 1985;Bai et al, 2000); and (vii) models of superovulation show increased OSE proliferation and inclusion cyst formation (Burdette et al, 2006(Burdette et al, , 2007.…”