2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.04.18.22271936
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anti-nucleocapsid antibodies following SARS-CoV-2 infection in the blinded phase of the mRNA-1273 Covid-19 vaccine efficacy clinical trial

Abstract: Importance: The performance of immunoassays for determining past SARS-CoV-2 infection, which were developed in unvaccinated individuals, has not been assessed in vaccinated individuals. Objective: To evaluate anti-nucleocapsid antibody (anti-N Ab) seropositivity in mRNA-1273 vaccine efficacy trial participants after SARS-CoV-2 infection during the trial's blinded phase. Design: Nested analysis in a Phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled vaccine efficacy trial. Nasopharyngeal swabs for SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing w… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(v) We defined previous infection in participants as previously testing PCR positive for SARS-CoV-2, or seroconversion to anti-N positivity during the study. However, some of the group labelled as naïve could have been exposed to SARS-CoV-2, and anti-N seroconversion is less likely in vaccinated people and differs between variants (Follmann et al, 2022; Whitaker et al, 2021). (vi) For people with vaccine breakthrough infections since the second vaccine dose, infecting sequence data was not always available.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(v) We defined previous infection in participants as previously testing PCR positive for SARS-CoV-2, or seroconversion to anti-N positivity during the study. However, some of the group labelled as naïve could have been exposed to SARS-CoV-2, and anti-N seroconversion is less likely in vaccinated people and differs between variants (Follmann et al, 2022; Whitaker et al, 2021). (vi) For people with vaccine breakthrough infections since the second vaccine dose, infecting sequence data was not always available.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, biases in the sampling could also vary over time and across states, for instance as a function of the numbers of cases and underlying demographics. Rates of seroconversion and reversion might also be different preand post-vaccination (e.g., Follmann et al, 2022 ; Goldberg et al, 2022 ; Carazo et al, 2022 ). We use numbers of tests that were positive and negative in the models, meaning that we do not make explicit adjustments for race, ethnicity, age, or sex, although these factors are, to an extent, captured in the model with state-specific intercepts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability to detect seroconversion may have been limited by the technical sensitivity of the assay used and by the potential delay or attenuation of IgG-N antibody response in individuals who were immunocompromised or received mRNA vaccination. 29,30 Thus, the established criterion for seroconversion used in this analysis may have underestimated the true prevalence of seroconversion during the study period. The modest sample size had limited statistical power to detect multiple factors associated with Omicron variant infection awareness; larger studies could identify additional potentially important factors.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%