1991
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-3472(05)80643-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anti-predator behaviour and mating systems in waders: aggressive nest defence selects for monogamy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a nest ages and its relative value increases, parents can increase their investment by defending it more aggressively (reviewed in Montgomerie and Weatherhead 1988;Forbes et al 1994). Aggressive forms of nest defence are typically more common and more successful among monogamous, biparental incubators (Larsen 1991;Larsen et al 1996). We found the level of nest defence (i.e.…”
Section: Age-related Patterns In Shorebird Nest Survivalmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a nest ages and its relative value increases, parents can increase their investment by defending it more aggressively (reviewed in Montgomerie and Weatherhead 1988;Forbes et al 1994). Aggressive forms of nest defence are typically more common and more successful among monogamous, biparental incubators (Larsen 1991;Larsen et al 1996). We found the level of nest defence (i.e.…”
Section: Age-related Patterns In Shorebird Nest Survivalmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…We also predicted that shorebird nest survival would increase throughout the season, but as a result of intensification of nest defence. While both mechanisms predict a positive relationship, the latter also predicts an interaction between nest age and incubation system, as biparental species are more aggressive and more successful at defending their nests (Larsen 1991;Larsen et al 1996). Nest age and day of season can be difficult to separate when nests are initiated synchronously, but because we had a large sample of nests that were initiated across the season we included both variables in models.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Time spent by males in the alert or vigilanceposture was significantly higher before desertion than after, and males of biparentally-attended broods took greater risks by approaching a potential predator more closely during distraction displays, than did deserted males. Further studies are required to test other potential predation-related advantages of biparental care such as earlier detection or aggressive deterrence of predators (Larsen 1991).…”
Section: Cost Of Desertionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, single males may be less effective in protecting chicks from predators, e.g. they may spend less time in alert (vigilance) behaviour, they may attend chicks from further away, or they may take fewer risks in luring potential predators away from the chicks during distraction displays than in biparentally attended broods (Safriel 1975;Warriner et al 1986;Larsen 1991). Third, single males may provide an inferior feeding territory for the brood, in which case chicks in deserted broods should show reduced growth rates compared to those in biparental broods (Walters 1982).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A higher density of conspecifics and heterospecifics could result in more efficient anti‐predator defense. Aggressive nest defense is particularly common in large species as a consequence of a minimum size being necessary for successfully chasing away predators, and two cooperating vigilant parents are more efficient than one in defending nests (Larsen ). Here we tested for effects of density‐dependent anti‐predator behavior by conspecifics and heterospecifics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%