IntroductionNeutropenia is a condition where the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) is lower than 1500 cells/µL or is expected to drop below 500 cells/µL within a 48-h time period. When classifying the condition, 1000-1500 ANC/µL is accepted as mild, 500-1000 ANC/µL is accepted as intermediary, and less than 500 ANC/µL is accepted as severe neutropenia. On the other hand, neutropenic fever is a condition where the body temperature is greater than 38 °C for more than 1 h or is measured to be higher than 38 °C twice during a 12-h period (1). The signs and occurrence of infection in a neutropenic patient are also evaluated as febrile neutropenia (FN), even if there is no fever (2).In this study, clinical characteristics, treatment results of the FN attacks occurring in our patients with lymphoma and solid tumors factors treated due to FN, and factors influencing clinical pursuit and treatment results were compared with the literature.
Materials and methods
Ethical declarationEthical approval of the study was granted by the scientific research ethics board of our university.
PatientsIn this study, 94 high-risk FN attacks that occurred in 50 pediatric patients were examined retrospectively. Patients with lymphoma and solid tumors received chemotherapy for malignant disease in the Pediatric Hematology and Oncology Clinic between the years of 2011 and 2013.
Criteria for exclusion from the studyPatients with one of the following factors were excluded from the study: leukemia, a neutrophil count and fever that did not comply with the criteria described below, the source of fever being thought to be noninfectious, the patient being older than 18, the patient having had received antibiotics during the last 10 days, and the administration of glycopeptide (GP) at the beginning.Background/aim: The clinical characteristics and treatment results of febrile neutropenia attacks that occurred in patients with lymphoma and solid tumors were analyzed.
Materials and methods:A total of 50 patients with 94 high-risk attacks were evaluated for malignant diseases in this study.
Results:The fever etiology was determined as clinical (50%), microbiological (5.31%), clinical-microbiological (5.31%), or unknown (39.3%). A few of the attacks (21.3%) were observed in lymphoma cases and 77.7% were observed in patients with solid tumors. Patients who were in remission had 59.6% of the attacks, and 39.4% occurred in patients not in remission. Among the groups tested, 73% (the imipenem/amikacin group) and 47.9% (the piperacillin-tazobactam/amikacin group) of patients were in remission. Glycopeptide addition rates in these groups were 22.2% and 40.8% and antifungal addition rates were 8.8% and 18.3%, respectively.
Conclusion:Clinical progress was more problematic in patients who were not in remission during the attacks. This was due to the fact that some patients had other factors that placed them in the high-risk group, as well as increased C reactive protein and procalcitonin values on the first day. Therefore, it may not be accurate to associate the ...