2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-32583-1_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anti-Spoofing in Face Recognition: Deep Learning and Image Quality Assessment-Based Approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is difficult to compare performance because each existing approach uses a different testing environment, performance measurements, and datasets. The HTER and testing accuracy noticed in the suggested work provided here using VGG19; however, are better than the regarded existing equivalent attempts from the literature [20,23,24,29] when one compares the explorations carried out utilising datasets NUAA and Replay-Attack (as presented in Table 9 for comparison of existing methods with the proposed approach).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is difficult to compare performance because each existing approach uses a different testing environment, performance measurements, and datasets. The HTER and testing accuracy noticed in the suggested work provided here using VGG19; however, are better than the regarded existing equivalent attempts from the literature [20,23,24,29] when one compares the explorations carried out utilising datasets NUAA and Replay-Attack (as presented in Table 9 for comparison of existing methods with the proposed approach).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Two Presentation Attack Detection (PAD) techniques are developed by Elloumi et al [24] based on deep learning with the quality evaluation of the image. The first strategy uses the LBP histogram computation and VGG16 finetuning, whereas the other strategy relies on Image Quality Measures.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers proposed their own models [45] trained from scratch, while others employed pre-trained models like AlexNet [72] and ResNet [81]. In our technique, we used the model introduced by the Oxford Visual Geometry Group (VGG), as this model is widely utilized and provided decent results in many applications [67,[82][83][84][85][86]. More precisely, we fine-tuned the pre-trained VGG16 model without data augmentation, since these treatments change the structure of the data and thus modify the perceived quality [87].…”
Section: Cnn Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%