2018
DOI: 10.3842/sigma.2018.098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anti-Yetter-Drinfeld Modules for Quasi-Hopf Algebras

Abstract: We apply categorical machinery to the problem of defining anti-Yetter-Drinfeld modules for quasi-Hopf algebras. While a definition of Yetter-Drinfeld modules in this setting, extracted from their categorical interpretation as the center of the monoidal category of modules has been given, none was available for the anti-Yetter-Drinfeld modules that serve as coefficients for a Hopf cyclic type cohomology theory for quasi-Hopf algebras. This is a followup paper to the authors' previous effort that addressed the s… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More precisely, in Section 9.1 we attempt to explain, by sketching the commutative case, why the mixed anti-Yetter-Drinfeld contramodules in the Hopf setting are exactly analogous to the D-modules in the geometric setting. In Section 9.2 we link the monadic approach with the previous attempts [10,15,14,18,19] to understand Hopf cyclic coefficients as centers of certain bimodule categories. that are compatible with the S 1 -actions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More precisely, in Section 9.1 we attempt to explain, by sketching the commutative case, why the mixed anti-Yetter-Drinfeld contramodules in the Hopf setting are exactly analogous to the D-modules in the geometric setting. In Section 9.2 we link the monadic approach with the previous attempts [10,15,14,18,19] to understand Hopf cyclic coefficients as centers of certain bimodule categories. that are compatible with the S 1 -actions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Sections 6 and 7 address the definitions of Hopf algebroids, the biclosed property of their categories of modules (we provide a direct proof, but the fact can also be obtained from [21]) and finally the translation into formulas of the definition of anti-Yetter-Drinfeld contramodules and their stability. We remark that we handled the case of anti-Yetter-Drinfeld module analogues in our follow-up paper [14]. We did not want to increase the length of the exposition any further and modules, despite being more familiar, are actually technically more difficult and less natural/suitable from the categorical perspective on the subject of coefficients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%