“…They also bear the ability to systematically vary and functionalize their pore structure [2,3]. In the history of MOFs, a benchmark was represented by the synthesis of MOF-5 (Zn 4 O(bdc) 3 , bdc = terephthalate) and HKUST-1 (Cu 3 (btc) 2 , btc = 1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylate) with high porosity and low pressure gas sorption, followed by the development of chromium(III) terephthalate (MIL-101) with high chemical stability, MOF-74 (Zn 2 (dhbdc), dhbdc = 2,5-dihydroxy-1,4-benzenedicarboxylate) with low pressure adsorption of CO 2 , and several isostructural analogs of Mg-MOF-74 termed as IRMOF-74-I to IRMOF-74-XI, with large pore apertures to accommodate protein, NU-110E with acetyleneexpanded hexatopic linker, having material highest experimental Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) surface area of any porous material reported to date (7140 m Table 1 [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. …”