2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfda.2016.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antibacterial activity and interactions of plant essential oil combinations against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria

Abstract: The aim of this study was to compare the antibacterial effects of several essential oils (EOs) alone and in combination against different Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria associated with food products. Parsley, lovage, basil, and thyme EOs, as well as their mixtures (1:1, v/v), were tested against Bacillus cereus, Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, and Salmonella typhimurium. The inhibitory effects ranged from strong (thyme EO against E. coli) to no inhibition (parsley EO … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

12
142
2
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 204 publications
(157 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
12
142
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The disc diffusion assay showed that the oils showing the greatest inhibitory effects were thyme, cinnamon bark and lemongrass. Of these, thyme EO was most effective, an observation reported previously by Semeniuc et al () where it was most effective when compared to three other oils. Although the MRSA strain used was resistant to gentamicin in this study, cinnamon bark, lemongrass, manuka, rosemary and thyme EOs all produced zones >18 mm.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…The disc diffusion assay showed that the oils showing the greatest inhibitory effects were thyme, cinnamon bark and lemongrass. Of these, thyme EO was most effective, an observation reported previously by Semeniuc et al () where it was most effective when compared to three other oils. Although the MRSA strain used was resistant to gentamicin in this study, cinnamon bark, lemongrass, manuka, rosemary and thyme EOs all produced zones >18 mm.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…In Gram‐negative bacteria, the cell membrane and cell wall structures have some barriers (e.g., outer membrane) which prevent antibiotic compounds from penetrating the cells; therefore Gram‐negative bacteria are more resistant to most antibiotics and chemical compounds in comparison to the Gram‐positive ones. Also, the superior efficacy of DCMH‐loaded mats in comparison with TEO‐loaded mats may be justified by the lipophilicity of the DCMH which can penetrate into the cell membrane more readily, and hence can deal with both Gram‐positive and Gram‐negative bacteria to a more significant extent …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the superior efficacy of DCMH-loaded mats in comparison with TEO-loaded mats may be justified by the lipophilicity of the DCMH which can penetrate into the cell membrane more readily, and hence can deal with both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria to a more significant extent. 49 In this study, DCMH and TEO were separately loaded on to the scaffolds with concentrations of 94.5 and 476.3 mg, respectively. It has been reported that DCMH concentrations beyond 200 mg have not any cytotoxicity effect on fibroblast cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Essential oils were extracted by hydrodistillation (50 g of dried leaves with 750 mL distilled water) using a Clevenger-type apparatus (for 3 hours). The extracts were dried over anhydrous sodium sulphate and stored at 4ºC until analysis (Semeniuc et al, 2017). A Shimadzu Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrophotometer (IRPrestige-21) equipped with a Horizontal Attenuated Total Reflectance (HATR) accessories was used to collect FTIR spectra.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%