PLATES XVII AND XVIIIFUSIDIC A C I D is a potent bactericidal antistaphylococcal agent, but one of its drawbacks is the presence in any staphylococcal population exceeding about lo6 cells of genotypically resistant variants that might proliferate during fusidic acid therapy. Because of this, combinations of fusidic acid with other antistaphylococcal agents have been recommended and penicillins have figured largely amongst those chosen. The wisdom of this choice has been questioned because antagonism has been demonstrated in vitro between fusidic acid and penicillins.Reports in the literature of possible interactions between fusidic acid and penicillins are conflicting. Barber and Waterworth (1962) showed synergy between fusidic acid and benzylpenicillin in certain circumstances, and Jensen and Kiaer (1964) confirmed this, as well as reporting synergy with other agents including methicillin. On the other hand, other workers (Mouton and Koelman, 1966;Jensen and Lassen, 1969) have found antagonism against some strains of staphylococci between fusidic acid and methicillin and sometimes other penicillins including benzylpenicillin.The present study was undertaken in an attempt to clarify the situation in view of the increasing frequency with which combinations of fusidic acid and penicillins are being used in antistaphylococcal therapy.
MATERIALS AND METHODSStrains of coagulase-positive Staphylococcus aureus were taken at random from those isolated in the diagnostic laboratory of the hospital. Both penicillin-sensitive and penicillinase-producing strains that were sensitive on routine testing to fusidic acid and methicillin were included. Strains were designated by the first three letters of the name of the patient from whom they had been isolated, e.g. Col.The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the antibiotics for the strains was determined by a conventional serialdilution tube titration with small inoculum (c. 104-105 organisms per ml). Turbidimetric studies were made by inoculating 15 ml of nutrient broth with the test organism and incubating the continuously mixed culture in the light path of a simple photometer (Watson et al., 1969) housed in an incubator at 3 7 ' C and connected to a continuous recorder. The system will respond to bacterial concentrations in excess of lo6 per ml. Antibiotic was added when an opacity corresponding with a viable count of about 5 x lo7 organisms per ml had been reached. The number of survivors recoverable after incubating the organism overnight in broth with the various agents alone and in combination was determined by filtering the cultures