2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2007.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antibacterial activity of remifentanil and mixtures of remifentanil and propofol

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10 Remifentanil, which is an analog of fentanyl, was also stated to decrease bacterial growth. 16,17 Tamai-Shacooriz et al in their investigation, reported that sufentanil increased the antibacterial activity of bupivacaine but not ropivacaine. 9 Antibacterial effect of lidocaine was shown in several investigations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…10 Remifentanil, which is an analog of fentanyl, was also stated to decrease bacterial growth. 16,17 Tamai-Shacooriz et al in their investigation, reported that sufentanil increased the antibacterial activity of bupivacaine but not ropivacaine. 9 Antibacterial effect of lidocaine was shown in several investigations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A fentanyl analog “remifentanil” was investigated by Apan et al . [ 17 ] in the same manner. They have observed similar microbial inhibition on S. aureus , P. aeruginosa , E. coli and C. albicans depending on the concentration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apan et al found that the growth of E. coli was less affected compared with other agents when an agent known to inhibit E. coli reproduction (remifentanil) was added to propofol. they emphasized that the lipid content of propofol highly facilitated bacterial growth, and attentive aseptic conditions must be observed while using propofol to avoid any possible contamination (17). A study investigating how heat and the inclusion of lidocaine into propofol affected bacterial contamination showed that less bacterial growth was detected in samples preserved in sterilized injectors compared with those preserved as open ampules.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%