2008
DOI: 10.5580/8d1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antibacterial Activity of Selected Australian Native Plant Extracts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They found that Gram-positive strains were more sensitive than Gram-negative strains, and the most sensitive bacterium was S. aureus (26). In another study, the antibacterial activity of 39 methanolic extracts of 25 Australian herbs against two Gram-positive (Bacillus cereus and B. subtilis) and two Gram-negative (P. aeruginosa and Aeromonas hydrophila) was investigated, the results of which confirmed the sensitivity of Gram-positive bacteria (27).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…They found that Gram-positive strains were more sensitive than Gram-negative strains, and the most sensitive bacterium was S. aureus (26). In another study, the antibacterial activity of 39 methanolic extracts of 25 Australian herbs against two Gram-positive (Bacillus cereus and B. subtilis) and two Gram-negative (P. aeruginosa and Aeromonas hydrophila) was investigated, the results of which confirmed the sensitivity of Gram-positive bacteria (27).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%