Antibacterial cotton fabrics via immobilizing silver phosphate nanoparticles onto the chitosan nanofiber coating

Taheri, Parsa; Khajeh‐Amiri, Alireza

doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.04.258

Cited by 21 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 41 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…[ 139–141 ] The surface modification can be tailored mainly through the concentration of the solution and the immersion time. [ 142 ] This method allows the functionalization of nano‐/microfibers with distinct nanostructures as Co 3 O 4, [ 143 ] AgNWs, [ 144 ] TiO 2 , [ 145,146 ] SiO 2 , [ 147 ] Al 2 O 3 , [ 148 ] ZnO, [ 132,149 ] AgPO 4, [ 150 ] AgNPs, [ 151,152 ] graphene oxide, [ 153 ] reduced graphene oxide (rGO), [ 154 ] CNW(cellulose nanowhiskers):Ag, [ 155 ] CNW:Au, [ 156 ] sugarcane bagasse fly ash (SBFA), [ 157 ] MWCNTs, [ 158 ] and AgNPs/rGO. [ 159 ]…”

Section: Post‐modification Methods For Micro/nanofibermentioning

confidence: 99%

Tailoring the Surface Properties of Micro/Nanofibers Using 0D, 1D, 2D, and 3D Nanostructures: A Review on Post‐Modification Methods

Schneider

Facure

Chagas

et al. 2021

Adv Materials Inter

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Micro‐ and nanofibers produced by electrospinning and solution blow spinning (SBS) are highly suitable platforms for diverse applications due to their advantageous properties, including the high surface area to volume ratio, high porosity, and flexibility. To render them additional functionalities, distinct pre‐ or post‐modification processes have been proposed for modifying such micro‐ and nanofibers with 0D, 1D, 2D, and 3D nanostructures. The pre‐modification requires the addition of 0D–3D nanostructures (or their precursors) into the polymeric phase before the spinning process, which can demand laborious solubilization and requires changes in experimental spinning parameters, with impact on morphology, spinnability, and properties. Post‐modification methods, on the other hand, enable the fabrication of composite fibers without the need to optimize the spinning parameters, allowing a simple and efficient surface modification. Herein, recent advances on post‐modification methods of spun fibers, including wet chemistry, grafting, crosslinking, click chemistry, oxidations, hydrolysis and reduction strategies, dip‐coating, layer‐by‐layer, electro/air‐spray, atomic layer deposition, and plasma techniques aiming at the surface functionalization with 0D–3D nanostructures are surveyed. Recent results, trends, and challenges on the application of such surface‐modified fibers for environmental, industrial, and medical applications, including as adsorbent and filtering membranes, catalysts for pollutants degradation, and wearable sensors are examined.

show abstract

Section: Post‐modification Methods For Micro/nanofibermentioning

confidence: 99%

Tailoring the Surface Properties of Micro/Nanofibers Using 0D, 1D, 2D, and 3D Nanostructures: A Review on Post‐Modification Methods

Schneider

Facure

Chagas

et al. 2021

Adv Materials Inter

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…27 pointed out that tensile behavior, thickness, air permeability and comfort level are all affected by antimicrobial treatment. Also, the antibacterial rate of coating methods reduces to around 90% after laundering for five 28 and 10 cycles 29 (Figure 2).…”

Section: Materials Selectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Application of chitosan in the form of textile: production and sourcing

Luo

Yao

2022

Textile Research Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Chitosan material has multiple functions that attract attention from the textile industry, while textile structures make the biocompatible, osteo-conductive and resorbable material promising in a wide range of applications. When the material becomes fibers, the resulting length, strength, fineness and softness would grant the material functions such as structure capacity and a layering system. However, the expected win-win situation is not seen in reality. Special properties of the chitosan material may burden its way of application. In addition, market recognition of chitosan, differences between chitosan, chitin and seaweed fibers, differences in antibacterial post-treatment, testing standards of chitosan, antimicrobial and antibacterial treatment in downstream production and fuzzy concepts of users are also concerns and challenges related to chitosan. Gaps and misunderstandings between the supplier, manufacturer, consumer and researchers are clarified. Testing standards are compared by their purpose, mechanism and scope, while in this article, more attention is given to the application side. Existing forms of semi or final textile chitosan products, fabrication process and evaluation methods are reviewed and discussed for their feasibility towards application. In the end, a product development process flow is given marking concerns in each step of production to guide production and sourcing.

show abstract

“…However, most of the research work has been focused on antibacterial cotton textiles that look promising to be used in various applications. Cellulose‐based textiles are prone to microbial growth because of their porous nature and capacity to absorb moisture, which can produce bad odors, allergies, and hospital‐acquired diseases [4–6] . It is possible to find several germs on the apparel worn by patients, medical staff, and doctors that can be easily transferred from one individual to another [7,8] .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Advancements in Enhancing Antibacterial Properties of Cotton Fabric through Chitosan and Nanoparticles

Verma,

Ahuja,

Arora

2023

ChemistrySelect

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Over recent years, the garment industry has been actively seeking innovative solutions to address critical challenges in clothing production. One significant issue has been the susceptibility of hydrophilic cotton fabrics, commonly used in healthcare and sportswear, to bacterial growth, posing hygiene concerns. To deal with this, it becomes crucial for us to make durable cotton fabrics that can fight bacteria. This study explores the development of durable antibacterial cotton textiles by utilizing a range of antibacterial agents and mechanisms. Chitosan's properties, such as its ability to inhibit fungal growth, compatibility, non‐toxicity, bioactivity, and antimicrobial potential make it a promising candidate for the textile industry. Additionally, the incorporation of metal nanoparticles along with chitosan offers interesting potential, such as UV absorption, self‐cleaning capabilities, and antimicrobial activity. Therefore, research aimed at enhancing cotton fabric by harnessing the potential of chitosan and metal nanoparticles continues to attract significant attention in today's textile world. Cotton fabric modified by combining chitosan and nanoparticles exhibits high antimicrobial activity compared to fabric modified with either nanoparticles or chitosan alone. The implications of this study are far‐reaching with improvement in hygiene, comfort, and durability in a wide range of clothing applications, thus making a substantial contribution to the evolution of the textile industry.

show abstract

Antibacterial cotton fabrics via immobilizing silver phosphate nanoparticles onto the chitosan nanofiber coating

Cited by 21 publications

References 41 publications

Tailoring the Surface Properties of Micro/Nanofibers Using 0D, 1D, 2D, and 3D Nanostructures: A Review on Post‐Modification Methods

Tailoring the Surface Properties of Micro/Nanofibers Using 0D, 1D, 2D, and 3D Nanostructures: A Review on Post‐Modification Methods

Application of chitosan in the form of textile: production and sourcing

Advancements in Enhancing Antibacterial Properties of Cotton Fabric through Chitosan and Nanoparticles

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About