Antibacterial Effect of Aloe Vera and Glass Ionomer Modified by Aloe Vera on Streptococcus mutans

Sultan, Mayada

doi:10.21608/edj.2019.72664

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This may be due to low solubility in neutral pH which has low antibacterial effect. This results were in accordance with Sultan (2019) (23) who found that Amalgomer showed statistically significant the lowest value for the mean diameter of inhibition zone after 48 hours. However, this finding was in disagreement with Hugar et al (2016) (24) who demonstrated that Amalgomer have high antibacterial effect.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

Antibacterial Effect of Bioactive Composite versus Glass ionomer using Different Storage Media

2020

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: To evaluate the antibacterial effect of Bioactive composite versus Glass ionomer using different storage media. Materials and Methods: Three restorative materials were used in this study (Reliafil Lc, Amalgomer and Conventional Glass Ionomer). 90 Disk-shaped specimens (2.5 mm height and 8 mm diameter) were prepared from each material. Groups were divided into three subgroups according to storage media (Acids, artificial saliva and de-ionized water). Bacterial strains were polished at 37 0 c for 24h in Brain Heart Infusion broth which attained from stock cultures. Disk diffusion agar method was used for antimicrobial liability. The inhibition zone diameter around the specimen were measured at three times by the same operator after 48hs using electronic digital caliper. Results: This study found that Amalgomer has the highest antibacterial effect in lactic acid. Whereas, Conventional GIC has the highest antibacterial effect in artificial saliva and Bioactive composite in deionized water. Conclusion: This study was concluded that all the restorative material tested had an antibacterial effect in all storage media though Amalgomer seemed to be more prominent in lactic acid.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

Antibacterial Effect of Bioactive Composite versus Glass ionomer using Different Storage Media

2020

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Bacteria were inoculated into brain heart infusion broth (BHI, Oxoid, Basingstoke, England) and cultivated over night at 37°C. The inoculum (100 l) was scrubbed on trypticase soy agar and allowed to be arid for ten minutes after being adjusted to match the turbidity of 0.5 McFarland standards [15]. Inhibition zone of 3 distinct restorations used in this study (Fuji II, Beautifil II, and Activa) were measured after anaerobic incubation at 37°C for 24 hours.…”

Section: Samples Storage For Testing Anti-bacterial Actionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Fluoride release and anti-bacterial activity of different bioactive restorative materials: an in vitro comparative study

Sabae,

Nabih,

Alsamolly

2023

jos

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Anti-bacterial properties of restorative materials through fluoride release enhance their inhibition ability against bacterial development, and reduce recurrent caries incidence. Objectives: The aim of the current in-vitro research was to assess and compare fluoride release and anti-bacterial activity of three distinct bioactive dental restorations, such as resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI), giomer, and Activa bioactive composite at different time intervals in vitro. Material and methods: 60 disc-shaped specimens were prepared and based on the kind of dental restoration materials, and were grouped into three equivalent major groups (20 specimens each group): RMGI (Fuji II LC), giomer (Beautifil II), and enhanced RMGI (Activa bioactive composite). Every main group was divided into two sub-groups based on the evaluator criteria, such as fluoride release (n = 15) and anti-bacterial action (n = 5). Based on storage duration, every fluoride release sub-group was then sub-divided into 3 equivalent divisions: 24 hours, 1 month, and 3 months (5 specimens each group). An ion-specific electrode was used to quantify fluoride. Anti-bacterial activity was recorded following one day according to sizes of inhibition zone. Results: Fluoride release and anti-bacterial activity were statistically higher in Fuji II followed by Activa, while Beautifil II showed the least fluoride release. The fluoride release amount of all groups was greatest in the first 24 hours, and decreased significantly with time (1 month > 3 months). Conclusions: Given the context of this research, RMGI presents better fluoride release and anti-bacterial activity than Activa and giomer.

show abstract

“…However, the bacterial spectrum that could be inhibited due to fluoride release is still limited 6 . Addition of various synthetic constituents to glass ionomer cements was proposed in an attempt to enhance its antibacterial activity as chloroxylenol 6 , chlorhexidine gluconate 7 , doxycycline hyclate 8 , tetracycline 9 , ciprofloxacin, metronidazole and minocycline 10 .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Essential Oil Modification of Glass Ionomer Cement: Antibacterial Activity and Compressive Strength

Elkorashy

2022

Egyptian Dental Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: The current study was conducted to investigate the effect of essential oil (EO) modification of glass ionomer cement (GIC) on antibacterial activity and compressive strength.Methods: A total of 100 specimens were prepared; 50 specimens for the antibacterial activity test (3 mm x 2 mm) and 50 specimens for the compressive strength test (4 mm x 6 mm). Specimens were divided into five groups (n=10) according to the type of the essential oil used in modification of GIC; Group 1: unmodified glass ionomer cement (control group); Group 2: 2.5% bergamot modified GIC; Group 3: 2.5% peppermint modified GIC Group 4: 2.5% lemongrass modified GIC and Group 5: 2.5 % fennel modified GIC. Antibacterial activity was assessed using agar diffusion test. Compressive strength test was performed using universal testing machine. Data were tabulated and statistically analyzed.Results: Bergamot modified GIC recorded the highest mean inhibition zone, followed by fennel, then lemongrass and peppermint. The lowest mean value was revealed by the control group. Regarding compressive strength results, control group showed the highest mean value, followed by lemongrass, then peppermint and bergamot. The lowest mean value was recorded by fennel modified GIC. Conclusion:Essential oil modification of GIC was effective in enhancing the antibacterial activity although it adversely affects compressive strength in comparison to the control group. Lemongrass and peppermint essential oil modification of GIC were effective in improving antibacterial property while preserving an acceptable compressive strength according to the ISO standards.

show abstract

Antibacterial Effect of Aloe Vera and Glass Ionomer Modified by Aloe Vera on Streptococcus mutans

Cited by 3 publications

References 10 publications

Antibacterial Effect of Bioactive Composite versus Glass ionomer using Different Storage Media

Antibacterial Effect of Bioactive Composite versus Glass ionomer using Different Storage Media

Fluoride release and anti-bacterial activity of different bioactive restorative materials: an in vitro comparative study

Essential Oil Modification of Glass Ionomer Cement: Antibacterial Activity and Compressive Strength

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About