2020
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/jbbbe.48.111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antibacterial Effects of <i>Calotropisgigantea (L) </i>Extracts on <i>Porphyromonasgingivalis</i>

Abstract: The Porphyromonasgingivalis is one of the dominant bacteria that causes chronic periodontitis. These bacteria can penetrate the gingiva and cause tissue damage directly or indirectly with the induction of inflammation. The growth of Porphyromonasgingivalis can be inhibited by administrating the active compounds from plants that have an antibacterial effect such as Calotropisgigantea leaves.This study aimed to determine the antibacterial potential of Bidurileaves (Calotropisgigantea) extract against the Porphyr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Apart from that, research by Alibasyah explained that the highest concentration of extract will also produce greater antibacterial power because it contains more antibacterial compounds. 11,12 In accordance with the research, the best concentration for reducing the growth of S.mutans colonies is a concentration of 60% because at a concentration of 60% no bacterial growth was found. A concentration of 60% compared with K (+) shows that there is no significant difference in the results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Apart from that, research by Alibasyah explained that the highest concentration of extract will also produce greater antibacterial power because it contains more antibacterial compounds. 11,12 In accordance with the research, the best concentration for reducing the growth of S.mutans colonies is a concentration of 60% because at a concentration of 60% no bacterial growth was found. A concentration of 60% compared with K (+) shows that there is no significant difference in the results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…This is due to differences in the number of active compounds at each extract concentration. 11,12 The research results of the 20% concentration had a significant difference to the control (+), meaning that this concentration did not have the same antibacterial power as the control (+). This is due to the fact that the number of antibacterial compounds at a concentration of 20% is less and less stable, so that at this concentration bacterial growth is still found.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations