2020
DOI: 10.4315/jfp-19-469
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antibacterial Mechanism of Vanillic Acid on Physiological, Morphological, and Biofilm Properties of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacter hormaechei

Abstract: Many studies have evaluated the antimicrobial activity of natural products against various microorganisms, but to our knowledge there have been no studies of the possible use of natural products for their antimicrobial activity against Enterobacter hormaechei. In this study, we investigated vanillic acid (VA) for its antimicrobial activities and its modes of action against carbapenem-resistant E. hormaechei (CREH). The MIC of VA against CREH was determined by the agar diffusion method. The antibacterial action… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CLSM images of P. rettgeri cells within biofilms exposed to 4 MIC of SAG displayed dark red florescence, proving that most of the membranes of cells within the biofilm were damaged. Our study were divided into two main parts, one part demonstrated SAG had antimicrobial activity against P. rettgeri through causing cell membrane dysfunction and changes in cellular morphology, similarlgy a study by Qian et al (2020) , and the other part was the effect of SAG on P. rettgeri biofilm, which showed that different concentrations of SAG could inhibit the formation of P. rettgeri biofilm by changing the biofilm matrix while also killing through mature biofilms in chronic infections. The results were in line with previous reports that showed that SAG inhibits biofilm formation of Candida albicans and Staphylococcus aureus and synchronously reducing extracellular proteins, polysaccharides, and eDNA levels in a dose-dependent manner ( Qian et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…CLSM images of P. rettgeri cells within biofilms exposed to 4 MIC of SAG displayed dark red florescence, proving that most of the membranes of cells within the biofilm were damaged. Our study were divided into two main parts, one part demonstrated SAG had antimicrobial activity against P. rettgeri through causing cell membrane dysfunction and changes in cellular morphology, similarlgy a study by Qian et al (2020) , and the other part was the effect of SAG on P. rettgeri biofilm, which showed that different concentrations of SAG could inhibit the formation of P. rettgeri biofilm by changing the biofilm matrix while also killing through mature biofilms in chronic infections. The results were in line with previous reports that showed that SAG inhibits biofilm formation of Candida albicans and Staphylococcus aureus and synchronously reducing extracellular proteins, polysaccharides, and eDNA levels in a dose-dependent manner ( Qian et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Three of the eight active plant extracts (Salvia palaestina, Micromeria fruticose, and Salvia hierosolymitana boiss) show relatively high free radical scavenging, and four others (Foeniculum vulgare, Cichorium pumilum jacq, Ruta chalepensis, and Chrysanthemum coronarium) show medium free radical scavenging, while the remaining extract (Trigonella foenum-graecum) shows relatively low free radical scavenging. The results show that differences in antibacterial activity among the non-polar extracts cannot always be attributed to antioxidant levels but could be associated with inhibitory effects via other mechanisms of action [39] (inhibition or regulation of enzymes involved in cell wall biosynthesis, nucleic acid metabolism and repair, protein synthesis, or disruption of the membrane structure).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Gallic acid, catechin, and vanillic acid are the major phenolic compounds found in cereal vinegars [17]. The antimicrobial potential of these compounds against various pathogens, such as E. coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterobacter spp., Listeria spp., Mannheimia haemolytica, Pasteurella multocida, etc., has been demonstrated in several studies [74][75][76][77][78][79].…”
Section: Antimicrobial Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 74%