2006
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.22205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antibiotic prophylaxis in neutropenic patients

Abstract: New evidence shows that antibiotic prophylaxis in neutropenic patients reduces mortality, febrile episodes, and bacterial infections. For patients with acute leukemia or those who undergo bone marrow transplantation, prophylaxis with fluoroquinolones diminished the risk of death from any cause by 33% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 2-54%). Thus, 55 patients who have acute leukemia or who undergo bone marrow transplantation must receive prophylaxis to prevent 1 death. In 4 studies that included patients with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
99
1
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 177 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
4
99
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…100,101 Only when these results were included in a meta-analysis together with previous studies, a statistically significant reduction in mortality was reported. 102 Since few studies have been performed in the last decade, an update of this meta-analysis did not report any significant changes. 103 Of note, 2 recent meta-analyses, one involving exclusively HSCT recipients (over 1400 patients, mostly after autologous HSCT) and the other including only randomized placebo-controlled and blinded studies failed to show significant survival benefit of FQ prophylaxis.…”
Section: Othersmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…100,101 Only when these results were included in a meta-analysis together with previous studies, a statistically significant reduction in mortality was reported. 102 Since few studies have been performed in the last decade, an update of this meta-analysis did not report any significant changes. 103 Of note, 2 recent meta-analyses, one involving exclusively HSCT recipients (over 1400 patients, mostly after autologous HSCT) and the other including only randomized placebo-controlled and blinded studies failed to show significant survival benefit of FQ prophylaxis.…”
Section: Othersmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…9 Therefore, it seems reasonable to deduce the recommendations from the large number of randomized controlled clinical trials and the respective meta-analyses, which are available for other neutropenic conditions. [10][11][12][13][14][15] If the patient's condition allows (ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance status 0-2), the evaluation of patients with the possible diagnosis of AA can be performed as an outpatient.…”
Section: Prevention Of Infections By General Medical Management Of Aamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6][7] The use of prophylactic antibiotics in HSCT recipients has been an important measure reducing the risk of BSIs, particularly in the allogeneic setting. [7][8][9][10][11][12] Since the early 1970s, selective gut decontamination, aiming to suppress overgrowth and translocation of intestine aerobic microflora, has been suggested for reducing BSIs in HSCT recipients, particularly threats from Gram-negative pathogens. [13][14][15][16][17][18] Combination regimens with oral non-absorbable or partly absorbable antimicrobials, such as trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), metronidazole, vancomycin, nystatin, nalixidic acid or pipemidic acid and so on, were commonly used in the early decades.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%