“…Similar prevalence rate of MRSA in pus samples was observed by Pandya et al (2014) in Gujarat. On the other hand, the prevalence of MRSA in Nasal swabs was found to be 10.12%, followed by surgical wound infection (7.60%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Out of 153 S. aureus isolates, 42 (57.7%) were found to be methicillin-resistant. Pandya et al (2014) worked on characterization of MRSA from various clinical samples at a tertiary care hospital of rural Gujarat, reported among 200 isolates of S. aureus, 117 (58.5%) were methicillin-resistant. Dar et al (2006) studied the molecular epidemiology of clinical and carrier strains of MRSA in the hospital settings of North India reported 54.85% of MRSA from Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, India.…”
Multidrug resistant strains ofMoreover, this study revealed that the major MRSA isolates were from pus swabs (37.70%) followed by wound swabs (30.40%), hand swabs (8.90%), surgical wound swab (7.60%), axilla swabs (6.32%) and nasal swabs (10.12%).
“…Similar prevalence rate of MRSA in pus samples was observed by Pandya et al (2014) in Gujarat. On the other hand, the prevalence of MRSA in Nasal swabs was found to be 10.12%, followed by surgical wound infection (7.60%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Out of 153 S. aureus isolates, 42 (57.7%) were found to be methicillin-resistant. Pandya et al (2014) worked on characterization of MRSA from various clinical samples at a tertiary care hospital of rural Gujarat, reported among 200 isolates of S. aureus, 117 (58.5%) were methicillin-resistant. Dar et al (2006) studied the molecular epidemiology of clinical and carrier strains of MRSA in the hospital settings of North India reported 54.85% of MRSA from Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, India.…”
Multidrug resistant strains ofMoreover, this study revealed that the major MRSA isolates were from pus swabs (37.70%) followed by wound swabs (30.40%), hand swabs (8.90%), surgical wound swab (7.60%), axilla swabs (6.32%) and nasal swabs (10.12%).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.