Antibiotic stewardship program in Pakistan: a multicenter qualitative study exploring medical doctors’ knowledge, perception and practices

Abstract

Background The emerging threat of antibiotic resistance is growing exponentially and antibiotic stewardship programs are cornerstone to fight against this global threat. The study aimed to explore the knowledge, perspectives and practices of physicians regarding various aspects of antibiotic stewardship program including antibiotic stewardship activities, rational use of antibiotics, antibiotic resistance, prescribing practices and factors associated with these practices. Methods In this qualitative study, a total of 17 semi-structured, in-depth interviews with doctors of three tertiary care public sector hospitals in Bahawalpur and Rahim Yar Khan were conducted. The convenient sampling method was adopted to collect the data and the saturation point criterion was applied to determine the sample size. Thematic analysis approach was used to draw conclusions from the data. Results The analysis of data yielded five themes, 12 subthemes and 26 categories. The themes included, (i) perception about antibiotic use and antibiotic stewardship, (ii) antibiotic prescription practices, (iii) antibiotic resistance, (iv) limited strategies adopted by hospital administration to ensure quality and safe distribution of antibiotics, (v) implementation of antibiotic stewardship program: barriers, suggestion and future benefits. Doctors had misconceptions about the rational use of antibiotics. The perception regarding antibiotic stewardship programs was poor. Moreover, very few activities related to ASP existed. The participants gave many suggestions for successful implementation of ASP in order to reduce the burden of antibiotic resistance, including development of guidelines for the use of antibiotics, strict legislation regarding use of antibiotics, active participation of healthcare professionals and awareness program among general public about the use of antibiotics. Conclusion This study concluded that poor knowledge of doctors regarding ASP, non-existence of antibiogram of hospital and lack of rules for the safe use of antibiotics were the main driving factors associated with irrational antibiotic prescription practices and development of AR.

Frequency and Factors Associated With Adverse Events Among Multi-Drug Resistant Tuberculosis Patients in Pakistan: A Retrospective Study

“…This finding is supported by published studies elsewhere ( 28 , 41 , 46 , 56 , 57 ). One of the possible reasons of developing adverse events in this sub-group of patients might be due to polypharmacy and resultant drug–drug interactions ( 54 , 58 , 59 ). In addition, our study findings demonstrated that employed patients tend to experience more adverse events as compared with unemployed.…”

What impact does medicines shortages have on patients? A qualitative study exploring patients’ experience and views of healthcare professionals

“…Purposive sampling accompanied by convenience sampling was used to engage participants [ 40 ]. In the first stage, all healthcare professionals (HCPs) were purposively approached during working hours through telephone call or personal visit and invited to participate after explaining the brief intent of the study.…”

Spectrum of Microorganisms, Antibiotic Resistance Pattern, and Treatment Outcomes Among Patients With Empyema Thoracis: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study From the Bahawal Victoria Hospital Bahawalpur, Punjab, Pakistan

“…Similarly, other studies conducted in Pakistan, India, Hungary, and the US also reported high level of resistance to these antibiotics (39)(40)(41)(42)(43). The probable reason for increased antibiotic resistance could be an excess, inappropriate use and careless selection of antibiotics (44), as a number of studies have reported irrational prescribing, dispensing and use of antibiotics in Pakistan (45)(46)(47)(48). The rapidly growing antibiotic resistance in Pakistan demand effective implementation of antibiotic stewardship program in accordance with the recommendations of the WHO (49-51).…”