2001
DOI: 10.1128/aac.45.5.1511-1514.2001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antibiotic Susceptibilities of Genetically Characterized Streptococcus milleri Group Strains

Abstract: Previous studies of the antibiotic susceptibility of Streptococcus milleri group organisms have distinguished among species by using phenotypic techniques. Using 44 isolates that were speciated by 16S rRNA gene sequencing, we studied the MICs and minimum bactericidal concentrations of penicillin, ampicillin, ceftriaxone, and clindamycin for Streptococcus intermedius, Streptococcus constellatus, and Streptococcus anginosus. None of the organisms was resistant to beta-lactam antibiotics, although a few isolates … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

7
61
2
6

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
7
61
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…First, we used meropenum in combination with clindamycin which would be highly effective against most anaerobes [22]. Drug resistance was not revealed to the isolated S. constellatus, consistent with the previous findings that few case reports have describes drug resistance to SMG [1,24]. Moreover, the patient suffered from drug eruption presumably because of meropenem, we thus changed the antibiotic therapy to sulbactam/ampicillin, and continued until the patient has been afebrile for 48 hours according to the previous review [22].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…First, we used meropenum in combination with clindamycin which would be highly effective against most anaerobes [22]. Drug resistance was not revealed to the isolated S. constellatus, consistent with the previous findings that few case reports have describes drug resistance to SMG [1,24]. Moreover, the patient suffered from drug eruption presumably because of meropenem, we thus changed the antibiotic therapy to sulbactam/ampicillin, and continued until the patient has been afebrile for 48 hours according to the previous review [22].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Of all potential pathogens tested, 100% were susceptible to clindamycin and chloramphenicol; 96% were susceptible to penicillin, ceftriaxone, and cefazolin (MIC Յ 2 g/ml); 86% were susceptible to azithromycin (MIC Յ 0.5 g/ml) and tetracycline; 54% were susceptible to metronidazole and ciprofloxacin (MIC Յ 1 g/ ml), and only 7% were susceptible to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (MIC Յ 2/38 g/ml). All strains of the Streptococcus milleri group were susceptible to clindamycin, penicillin, and ceftriaxone, although occasional resistance in humans has been reported (9,27). Although metronidazole was largely effective against anaerobic gram-negative bacilli and gram-positive cocci in this study, it was ineffective against anaerobic grampositive bacilli and streptococci.…”
mentioning
confidence: 38%
“…For empirical therapy when an adequate culture cannot be performed, veterinary clinicians should consider the potential susceptibilities of the types of oral microbes isolated in our study, as well as of those reported in human (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)27) and other mammalian (13,14) studies. New methods of nonoral delivery of clindamycin, ceftiofur, and penicillins are currently under investigation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Portanto, os resultados obtidos através do método de disco difusão foram confirmados pela CIM de benzilpenicilina, assegurando a correlação dos resultados. Em outro estudo, Tracy et al (2001) avaliaram a susceptibilidade de 44 isolados de S. milleri frente à penicilina; CIM <0,12μg/mL confirmaram a sensibilidade desta espécie a este antimicrobiano. No entanto, Heffelfinger et al (2000) interpretam como sensível quando a CIM for <1,00μg/mL de penicilina para Streptococcus pneumoniae.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified