2022
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkac053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antibiotic use during pregnancy and the risk of preterm birth: a population-based Swedish cohort study

Abstract: Objectives To assess the impact of gestational antibiotics on the risk of preterm birth, since a healthy maternal microbiome may be protective. Methods Population-based cohort study including all first pregnancies in Sweden (2006–16). The association between gestational and recent pre-conception systemic antibiotics and preterm birth was assessed by multivariable logistic regression presented as ORs and 95% CIs, adjusted for … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The unique Swedish personal identification number allowed for a valid data linkage across the Medical Birth Registry, Causes of Death Registry, Swedish Prescribed Drug Registry, and the National Patient Registry (inpatient and specialist outpatient care) [ 18 ]. This cohort has previously been described in more detail [ 19 , 20 ], and was approved by the Regional Ethics Committee of Stockholm (2017/2423–31), which waived the need for informed consent because of the registry-nature of the data. The study accords to European General Data Protection Regulations, and the Declaration of Helsinki.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The unique Swedish personal identification number allowed for a valid data linkage across the Medical Birth Registry, Causes of Death Registry, Swedish Prescribed Drug Registry, and the National Patient Registry (inpatient and specialist outpatient care) [ 18 ]. This cohort has previously been described in more detail [ 19 , 20 ], and was approved by the Regional Ethics Committee of Stockholm (2017/2423–31), which waived the need for informed consent because of the registry-nature of the data. The study accords to European General Data Protection Regulations, and the Declaration of Helsinki.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The last menstrual period date was calculated by extracting the gestational age (as dated at ultrasound, from embryo transfer or last menstrual period) from the date of birth. As the date of birth was provided in year/month format due to privacy regulations, it was set as the 15th of each month in all the observations [ 29 , 30 ]. Early-life exposure was defined as having received ≥ 1 dispensed antibiotic from birth until 2 years of age, ensuring that exposure occurred prior to the diagnosis of the outcome; and the first 2 years of life are regarded as being the most critical in the formation of a healthy microbiome [ 31 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nguyen et al’s study [ 39 ] provided a different perspective, assessing the impact of gestational antibiotic use on preterm birth risks. Their findings show an increased risk of preterm birth associated with antibiotic use during pregnancy, particularly in the first and second trimesters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study was performed using a Swedish cohort including all live singleton births delivered between July 2006 and December 2016, and the terminology "women" and "mother" were defined based on their biological sex and pregnancy status, not their gender identity. The cohort was created by linking information from four high-quality nationwide Swedish health data registries maintained by the National Board of Health and Welfare (Socialstyrelsen), as described earlier [21,22]: the Medical Birth Registry [23][24][25] (established in 1973), the Prescribed Drug Registry [26] (established in July 2005), the Patient Registry (in-and outpatient care) [27,28], and the Causes of Death Registry (since 1952). Information was linked through the unique Swedish personal identification number [29].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%