2014
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00282
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antibiotics in Canadian poultry productions and anticipated alternatives

Abstract: The use of antibiotics in food-producing animals has significantly increased animal health by lowering mortality and the incidence of diseases. Antibiotics also have largely contributed to increase productivity of farms. However, antibiotic usage in general and relevance of non-therapeutic antibiotics (growth promoters) in feed need to be reevaluated especially because bacterial pathogens of humans and animals have developed and shared a variety of antibiotic resistance mechanisms that can easily be spread wit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
149
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 212 publications
(155 citation statements)
references
References 117 publications
(158 reference statements)
4
149
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Non-judicious usage of antibiotics for therapeutic purpose or as growth promoters in poultry industry has led to selective pressure on various bacteria (Escherichia coli, Salmonella serovars; Enterococcus spp., Clostridium perfringens) resulting in emergence of multidrug resistant strains which is a matter of serious concern for public health [33,34]. Infections due to such strains are very difficult to treat.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-judicious usage of antibiotics for therapeutic purpose or as growth promoters in poultry industry has led to selective pressure on various bacteria (Escherichia coli, Salmonella serovars; Enterococcus spp., Clostridium perfringens) resulting in emergence of multidrug resistant strains which is a matter of serious concern for public health [33,34]. Infections due to such strains are very difficult to treat.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the potential costs of inaction, this study, among others, calls for urgent and concerted action in all countries, which is needed to limit the overuse and abuse of antimicrobials in food animal production (2,18,47). These actions should include (i) implementation of a publicly funded international surveillance network of antimicrobial consumption in food animals in countries undergoing rapid intensification in the livestock sector, (ii) collaboration with veterinary drug manufacturers and animal feed producers to cross-validate estimates of consumption with sales data, (iii) implementation of an international agenda to harmonize regulatory frameworks among countries, and (iv) the ultimate phasing out of antimicrobial use for growth promotion, based on the successful experience in the European Union and the new biological (48,49) and economic (50,51) evidence challenging the purported benefits of antimicrobial use in food animal production.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the fact that antimicrobials for growth promotion can generally be purchased without veterinary involvement, low subinhibitory concentrations of antibiotics used to improve animal growth has been shown to promote antibiotic resistance emergence (Aminov and Mackie, 2007; Andersson and Hughes, 2010; Nosanchuk et al, 2014). No recent studies have been able to clearly establish a link between the use of antibiotics as growth promoters and the improvement of animal performance in modern farming conditions with a high level of sanitation (Diarra and Malouin, 2014). …”
Section: One Health Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%