2012
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd001211.pub3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antibiotics versus placebo for acute bacterial conjunctivitis

Abstract: Analysis 2.2. Comparison 2: Antibiotics vs placebo -sensitivity analysis and post hoc subgroup analysis, Outcome 2: Microbiological e icacy at end of therapy -mITT population, excluding age < 1 month or no reporting of age limit.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In a recent review of eleven randomized clinical trials with a total of 3,673 participants, it was found that the use of antibiotic eye drops is associated with modestly improved rates of clinical and microbiological remission in comparison to the use of placebo 18. The use of antibiotic eye drops should, therefore, be considered in order to induce resolution of symptoms and infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent review of eleven randomized clinical trials with a total of 3,673 participants, it was found that the use of antibiotic eye drops is associated with modestly improved rates of clinical and microbiological remission in comparison to the use of placebo 18. The use of antibiotic eye drops should, therefore, be considered in order to induce resolution of symptoms and infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Symptoms include burning, itching, foreign body sensations, discharge, overproduction of tears, and variable presence of papillae (bacterial and allergic conjunctivitis) or follicles (viral or chemical conjunctivitis) [11]. Topically administered antibiotics are most commonly recommended for rapid resolution of the infection and prevention of transmission [12]. Though mild cases have the potential of resolving on their own, the availability of antibiotics specific to children suffering from more severe cases of bacterial conjunctivitis is limited.…”
Section: Pediatric Ocular Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Naturally, if the doctor does not have much time to perform a systematic review and then critically appraise all potentially relevant studies, he might be inclined to follow the advice of well-conducted summaries of evidence. In this respect, current evidence-based guidelines for patients with 'acute conjunctivitis' suggest that this is typically a self-limiting condition in which topical antibiotics offer only marginally better clinical outcomes [22][23][24][25]. In the face of a recommendation backed up by 'gold standard' methods, and assuming that the preferences of Mr Smith are not an obstacle, many doctors would be tempted to conclude that Mr Smith should not receive antibiotics, and that this properly evidence-based clinical advice does not deserve further revision.…”
Section: Section 1: Therapeutic Inferences Unreasonable and Reasonabmentioning
confidence: 99%