2014
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd010252.pub2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antibody induction versus corticosteroid induction for liver transplant recipients

Abstract: Antibody induction versus corticosteroid induction for liver transplant recipients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 128 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Antibody induction along with delayed CNI introduction can be used to preserve renal function in LT recipients and reduce renal dysfunction in those with impairment [24] . Overall, no significant increase in adverse side effects was observed in solid transplant recipients receiving antibody induction [23,25] . However, their use [52,55] …”
Section: Antibodiesmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Antibody induction along with delayed CNI introduction can be used to preserve renal function in LT recipients and reduce renal dysfunction in those with impairment [24] . Overall, no significant increase in adverse side effects was observed in solid transplant recipients receiving antibody induction [23,25] . However, their use [52,55] …”
Section: Antibodiesmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Less frequent diabetes mellitus, less CMV infections and higher glomerular filtration rate were observed among patients receiving IL2Ra vs those who received corticosteroids as induction therapy. The two IL2Ra agents, basiliximab and daclizumab did not differ in the mentioned advantages when analyzed by Penninga et al [23] and may be used interchangeably.…”
Section: Non-depleting Antibodiesmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations