2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2022.100190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antibody persistence following administration of a hexavalent DTwP-IPV-HB-PRP∼T vaccine versus separate DTwP-HB-PRP∼T and IPV vaccines at 12–24 months of age and safety and immunogenicity of a booster dose of DTwP-IPV-HB-PRP∼T in healthy infants in India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite isolated differences, such as higher anti-polio GMTs in the DTwP-IPV-HB-PRP∼T group and higher anti-FHA GMC in the DTwP-HB-PRP∼T and IPV group, no differences between the two groups were considered to be clinically important and such isolated differences were expected for this type of vaccine [22] , [23] , [24] . These data are comparable to previous data for the new hexavalent vaccine [6] , [7] as well as other vaccines of this type [25] , [26] , [27] , [28] , [29] , [30] , [31] , [32] suggesting no interaction due to the co-administration with rotavirus vaccine. In particular, the high anti-polio antibody titers for the DTwP-IPV-HB-PRP∼T vaccine, which were almost twice as high as for standalone IPV and expected due to the adjuvant effect of aluminum contained in the vaccine [33] , [34] , [35] , [36] and consistent with previous studies, ensure alignment with the polio endgame strategy and withdrawal of OPV [3] , [37] .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Despite isolated differences, such as higher anti-polio GMTs in the DTwP-IPV-HB-PRP∼T group and higher anti-FHA GMC in the DTwP-HB-PRP∼T and IPV group, no differences between the two groups were considered to be clinically important and such isolated differences were expected for this type of vaccine [22] , [23] , [24] . These data are comparable to previous data for the new hexavalent vaccine [6] , [7] as well as other vaccines of this type [25] , [26] , [27] , [28] , [29] , [30] , [31] , [32] suggesting no interaction due to the co-administration with rotavirus vaccine. In particular, the high anti-polio antibody titers for the DTwP-IPV-HB-PRP∼T vaccine, which were almost twice as high as for standalone IPV and expected due to the adjuvant effect of aluminum contained in the vaccine [33] , [34] , [35] , [36] and consistent with previous studies, ensure alignment with the polio endgame strategy and withdrawal of OPV [3] , [37] .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…One participant died of SIDS before the third dose of DTwP-IPV-HB-PRP∼T was due, and this was not considered to be related to vaccine administration. The DTwP-IPV-HB-PRP∼T safety profile was comparable to previous studies with this vaccine [6] , [7] and its wP-antigen matching predecessor [48] , [49] , [50] .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Previous studies have shown good vaccine safety, strong immunogenicity and lot-to-lot consistency for the DTwP-IPV-HB-PRP~T vaccine following primary vaccination at 6–8, 10–12 and 10–14 weeks, and a booster at 12–24 months of age. 3–5 A full list of abbreviations used within this article can be found in Table, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/INF/F71.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%