2019
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.03300
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antibody Responses to Antigenic Targets of Recent Exposure Are Associated With Low-Density Parasitemia in Controlled Human Plasmodium falciparum Infections

Abstract: The majority of malaria infections in low transmission settings remain undetectable by conventional diagnostics. A powerful model to identify antibody responses that allow accurate detection of recent exposure to low-density infections is controlled human malaria infection (CHMI) studies in which healthy volunteers are infected with the Plasmodium parasite. We aimed to evaluate antibody responses in malaria-naïve volunteers exposed to a single CHMI using a custom-made protein microarray. All participants devel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
2
27
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This relationship remained after removal of outliers ( Supplementary Figure 5). Neither antibody score, nor individual antibody responses, were associated with parasite biomass during infection (Supplementary Figure S6A/B), in contrast to previous reports (48)(49)(50).…”
Section: Antibody Induction Is Associated With Th2-ctfh Activation Ducontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…This relationship remained after removal of outliers ( Supplementary Figure 5). Neither antibody score, nor individual antibody responses, were associated with parasite biomass during infection (Supplementary Figure S6A/B), in contrast to previous reports (48)(49)(50).…”
Section: Antibody Induction Is Associated With Th2-ctfh Activation Ducontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast between the positive association between Th2-cTfh and antibody induction, total antigen load was not associated with antibody development, in contrast to previous reported findings. 41 , 42 , 43 These differences between studies may be due to differences in experimental infection models (blood stage versus sporozoite stages) and differences in analytical approaches (including methods to define parasite exposure and antibodies tested). The results seen here indicate that parasite load alone cannot explain antibody development, which is instead governed by individual immune activation, including Th2-cTfh cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neither antibody score nor antibody variables were associated with parasite biomass during infection ( Figures S5A and S5B), in contrast to previous reports. [41][42][43] Furthermore, antibody induction was not associated with EOS time point nor with infection cohort ( Figures S5C-S5E). It has been hypothesized that short-lived plasma cell differentiation may be driven by Th1-cTfh cells.…”
Section: Antibody Induction Is Associated With Th2-ctfh Cell Activatimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total IgE was measured using a commercial ELISA kit (Thermo Fisher, Invitrogen, UK) according to manufacturer’s instructions and using a seropositivity cut-off of 7.8 ng/ml. Ascaris antigen was kindly provided by MariaYazdanbaksh (Leiden, Netherlands) and used to estimate reactivity with serum IgG using an in-house protein microarray assay ( 19 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%