Early reports of low level cross-neutralization reactions among the rhinoviruses (HAlving, CON~LLu and P~OCXNOW, 1964; HA~XPAl~IA~ et al., 1964) have been confirmed and expanded by F~NTERS and colleagues (1966) who found low level hcterologous responses in cattle immunised with rhinoviruses. They also showed that injection of previously immunised cattle and guinea pigs with heterologous related rhinoviruses induced anamnestie responses. In view of the possible applications to rhinovirus vaccines in man we investigated the heterologous responses induced in man by vaccines made from three different rhinoviruses which induce heterologous responses in animals: rhinovirus 2 which induced antibody in cattle against rhinoviruses 4, 33 and 34; rhinovirus 34 which induced heterologous antibody against rhinovirus 4 and some cross-reaction with rhinovirus 14; rhinovirus 35 which induced heterologous antibody against rhinoviruses 3, 4 and 14 (Fs, NT~aS et al,, 1966; ttAMaE, personal communication).Rhinovirus 2 vaccines were prepared either as live vaccine from PK strain grown in human embryo kidney cells or as formalin-inactivated vaccine from ttGP strain grown in monkey kidney cells. These vaccines were administered and sera collected as previously described (Scientific Committee on Common Cold Vaccines, 1965).Rhinovirus types 34 and 35 vaccines were grown in WI-38 cells and inactivated with formalin. Volunteers received two intramuscular injections of 1 ml of these vaccines at about monthly intervals. Sera were collected at each injection and one month after the final injection. Sera were titrated