2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.12.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anticipated Impact of the 2016 Federal Election on Federal Health Care Legislation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the rhetoric of the 2016 campaign and the eventual election of Donald Trump,45 Republicans seemed poised to capitalize on this long-standing position. Moreover, the early steps of both houses of Congress followed by the appointment of Representative Tom Price (a vocal critic of the ACA) as HHS Secretary cemented the clarity of this approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the rhetoric of the 2016 campaign and the eventual election of Donald Trump,45 Republicans seemed poised to capitalize on this long-standing position. Moreover, the early steps of both houses of Congress followed by the appointment of Representative Tom Price (a vocal critic of the ACA) as HHS Secretary cemented the clarity of this approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The budget reconciliation process allows for specific types of legislation to be passed by simple majority 20. Given an anticipated ‘no’ vote by all Senate Democrats, the BRCA could receive at most two ‘no’ votes by Senate Republicans to pass.…”
Section: The 2017 Timelinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…On 25 July Senator McConnell announced that, after 20 hours of debate, he would call for a vote on the repeal-without-replace legislation 20. As this had virtually no chance of passing, it would be followed by a vote on a version of the BCRA that included the Cruz amendment.…”
Section: The 2017 Timelinementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[4][5][6] Despite the new administration after the 2016 federal elections, the Quality Payment Program, and specifically the MIPS pathway, is expected to remain in place. 7 The QCDR was initially conceived by the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 8 as a mechanism to allow specialty societies to develop relevant specialty-specific metrics for reporting to the Physician Quality and Reporting System (PQRS) as an alternative to the existing, narrower in scope, generic measures previously accepted by CMS. However, QCDRs must reach a higher level of rigor than other registries, fulfilling CMS requirements regarding the demonstration of improvements in quality and efficiency.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%