2014
DOI: 10.1159/000364803
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anticipated Motivation for Genetic Testing among Smokers, Nonsmokers, and Former Smokers: An Exploratory Qualitative Study of Decision Making

Abstract: Objectives: This qualitative study explores the public's interest in genetic testing related to cigarette smoking, comparing the public's motivations with researchers' intentions for this technology. Methods: Adult nonsmokers (n = 463), former smokers (n = 163), and current smokers (n = 129) completed an online survey. Within a hypothetical scenario, respondents decided whether they desired genetic testing related to smoking and explained their decision making. A non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test was used to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The finding that 84.8% of current daily smokers reported a high interest in receiving genetic susceptibility testing results is higher than the previously reported value of 56% (Giordimaina et al 2014). This may be due to several factors, including possible historical changes in the public perception of genetic testing and/or selection bias in that both the observational study and the clinical trial included actual genetic testing.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The finding that 84.8% of current daily smokers reported a high interest in receiving genetic susceptibility testing results is higher than the previously reported value of 56% (Giordimaina et al 2014). This may be due to several factors, including possible historical changes in the public perception of genetic testing and/or selection bias in that both the observational study and the clinical trial included actual genetic testing.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 79%
“…This may be due to several factors, including possible historical changes in the public perception of genetic testing and/or selection bias in that both the observational study and the clinical trial included actual genetic testing. Although neither the observational study nor the clinical trial disclosed genetic susceptibility results to participants, their status as inperson genetic studies on nicotine dependence likely distinguishes them from the prior online study in which 75% of current smokers reported finding genetic susceptibility testing to be personally irrelevant (Giordimaina et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both positive family history (DeLisi & Bertisch, 2006;Wilde et al, 2010) and personal history (Giordimaina, Sheldon, & Petty, 2014;Laegsgaard et al, 2009) of a psychiatric condition are associated with increased interest in a genetic test that would determine individual risk (DeLisi & Bertisch, 2006;Giordimaina et al, 2014;Laegsgaard et al, 2009;Wilde et al, 2010). For example, 83.3% of family members of individuals with schizophrenia reported having interest in genetic testing if such a test became available in the future (DeLisi & Bertisch, 2006), and 83% of individuals who had a personal history of depression, anxiety, schizophrenia, or bipolar disorder were interested in psychiatric genetic testing (Laegsgaard et al, 2009).…”
Section: Family and Personal Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, 83.3% of family members of individuals with schizophrenia reported having interest in genetic testing if such a test became available in the future (DeLisi & Bertisch, 2006), and 83% of individuals who had a personal history of depression, anxiety, schizophrenia, or bipolar disorder were interested in psychiatric genetic testing (Laegsgaard et al, 2009). Current daily smokers were more interested in genetic testing for a gene related to smoking than nonsmokers or former smokers (Giordimaina et al, 2014), suggesting that there may be differences in interest between individuals with and without a current personal history of the condition.…”
Section: Family and Personal Historymentioning
confidence: 99%