Anticipating Precarity and Risk in Social Innovation Design for Entrenched Place-Based Disadvantage

Clarke, Rachel; Burkett, Ingrid

doi:10.1080/17547075.2019.1571305

Cited by 5 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…We identified new forms of direct collaboration with end users (e.g. young people) in the creation of new services (Cabrero et al, 2015;Clarke & Burkett, 2019;Herne et al, 2013;Piredda et al, 2017), as well as cross-sectoral forms of interactions between various public, private and civil actors (Ehlert et al, 2012;Krebs et al, 2013;Plunkett & Dyson, 2019;Raymond et al, 2018;Turner & Martin, 2005). These findings are in line with a shift towards more collaborative forms of governance, in which partnerships and networks involving multiple interdependent actors are seen as powerful avenues for increasing service innovation (Mandel & Keast, 2013).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 63%

Service Innovations Targeting NEETs: A Systematic Review

Haug,

Nylund,

Samuelsen

et al. 2023

Nordic Journal of Transitions, Careers and Guidance

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Exclusion from education, employment or training is a complex global challenge with major negative consequences for society and the individuals affected. Extant research on the services and interventions for helping individuals belonging to the not in education, employment or training (NEET) target group suggests that there is little evidence to support the efficacy of such services. Therefore, service innovation is needed to find new and better solutions. However, there has been little research on the extent to which service innovation is represented in the NEET literature. This article presents a systematic literature review based on the following question: What are the scope and characteristics of service innovations targeting NEETs in the research literature? The results show that the scope of research-based knowledge about service innovations is limited. Only 27 research articles and chapters matched the basic inclusion criteria of our literature review. The included articles revealed the following three main thematic areas related to the characteristics of service innovations: (1) cocreation in service development and service delivery, (2) new pedagogical approaches and (3) stimulating entrepreneurship activities. The results also show that there is an increasing focus on new forms of cross-sectoral collaboration to find novel ways of helping young people return to education and work. However, despite the importance of focusing on structural causes, most studies emphasise individual-oriented and relationship-building efforts. This article contributes to the literature by providing an overview and description of existing studies that deal with service innovation to meet the NEET challenge. ABSTRAKTÅ vaere utenfor utdanning og arbeid er en global og kompleks utfordring, som har store negative konsekvenser for individene som rammes og for samfunnet. Tidligere forskning på ulike tjenester og tiltak rettet mot denne målgruppen, som ofte kalles NEETs, viser at det er ingen eller minimale effekter. Det er behov for tjenesteinnovasjon for å finne nye og mer treffsikre løsninger. I hvilken grad tidligere forskning på NEETs omhandler tjenesteinnovasjon er imidlertid lite utforsket. Denne artikkelen er basert på en systematisk litteraturgjennomgang, med utgangspunkt i følgende

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 63%

Service Innovations Targeting NEETs: A Systematic Review

Haug,

Nylund,

Samuelsen

et al. 2023

Nordic Journal of Transitions, Careers and Guidance

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Typically, social services are poorly equipped to provide coherent support to people who experience precarity in many areas of their life. Even when they are well‐resourced, stand alone, single‐purpose services usually fail to enable people experiencing complex disadvantage (Clarke & Burkett, 2019). Because of its progressive appeal and cost saving potential, this form of place‐based work generally enjoys enthusiastic support from social service providers, government funders, and philanthropists (Mukherjee & Sayers, 2016; Queensland Council of Social Service, 2019).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Commonwealth place‐based policies for addressing geographically concentrated disadvantage: A typology and critical analysis

Hart

Connolly

2021

Aust J Public Adm

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A suite of ‘place‐based’ Commonwealth policy frameworks to address geographically concentrated socio‐economic disadvantage foreground local knowledge and devolve some decisions to multi‐government and local agent governance bodies. We analyse these policies with reference to Dewey's theory of democratic experimentalism, focussing on how publics are constituted in place and enrolled in processes of deliberation and problematisation, and on how policy success is framed. We categorise ‘place‐based’ policies into three groups. Statutory collaboration policies enable coordinated intergovernmental investment in regional economic regeneration and enact broad publics through a concern with economic growth. Collective impact policies commission for social service integration and figure the users and providers of social services as their publics. Indigenous partnership policies are concerned with ‘self‐reliance’, economic participation, and empowerment among Indigenous people. We find that only the policies in the latter type clearly provide their publics with epistemic or decision‐making power. Further research on the implementation of collective impact policies would be necessary to determine their participatory scope, and statutory collaboration policies provide little opportunity for input from their publics. Our aim is to highlight the democratic significance of who is included in place‐based deliberations and what is deemed to be valuable.

show abstract

“…Expectations on what participatory methods and practices can achieve can be fraught with assumptions concerning what constitutes appropriate levels of 'participation' from different cultures and different actors [20,44,91] potentially perpetuating or even exacerbating social inequalities [17,18,19,20]. Tensions stem from how participation in these schemes still functions within a colonising politics of development knowledge [73].…”

Section: Decolonising Pd Praxis and International Developmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…PD, alongside other cognate disciplines, is increasingly engaging with issues of decoloniality as praxis, where critical thinking and doing are conjoined in political forms of community action and inquiry [12,26,31,74]. This growing body of work has predominantly focused on key contributions across methodological and theoretical inquiry [1,47,63,65,72,79]; designing equitably with under-served and marginalised communities [6,17,18,19,36,83,84], invigorating debates in the design curriculum influenced by perspectives from authors and practitioners from the global South [9,11,50], while highlighting the necessity of citational justice in design reporting [48]. While the specificities of geography, intersectionality and working within borders is fundamental to these debates [6,28,57,86], few studies within PD have explicitly discussed a geopolitically informed approach to design exploring decolonising praxis with indigenous activists in the context of ongoing conflict and land-based dispossession.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Decolonising in, by and through participatory design with political activists in Palestine

Clarke

Talhouk

Beshtawi

et al. 2022

Participatory Design Conference 2022: Volume 1

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We contribute a conceptual framework for decolonising PD praxis with the aim of surfacing unsettling agendas. Our framework was developed in response to collaborating with young Bedouin activists in Palestine, where there is a need not only to delink approaches from potential damaging epistemological and ontological ways of knowing and being, but to recognise differently constituted positionalities, the geopolitical specificities of place and the role of INGOs alongside the cultural contexts of ongoing violence. We define our orientations as decolonising in, by and through PD praxis when working on issues of landbased conflict. We argue these multiplicitous orientations allow for negotiations between political struggle and indigenous connection to the land, how INGOs embody conflicting justice agendas and how equity enriches yet complicates community sustainment. In contexts of ongoing indigenous land-based conflict, we detail the framework as an approach for unsettling PD praxis. CCS CONCEPTS• Social and professional topics ~User characteristics ~Geographic characteristics

show abstract

Anticipating Precarity and Risk in Social Innovation Design for Entrenched Place-Based Disadvantage

Abstract: She focuses on practices of co-creation in design of services for the arts, craft and heritage sectors. Her work spans multicultural and intergenerational community development in social design, interaction design, and humancomputer interaction.

Cited by 5 publications

References 26 publications

Service Innovations Targeting NEETs: A Systematic Review

Service Innovations Targeting NEETs: A Systematic Review

Commonwealth place‐based policies for addressing geographically concentrated disadvantage: A typology and critical analysis

Decolonising in, by and through participatory design with political activists in Palestine

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About