Anticipating the Interaction between Technology and Morality: A Scenario Study of Experimenting with Humans in Bionanotechnology

Abstract

During the last decades several tools have been developed to anticipate the future impact of new and emerging technologies. Many of these focus on 'hard,' quantifiable impacts, investigating how novel technologies may affect health, environment and safety. Much less attention is paid to what might be called 'soft' impacts: the way technology influences, for example, the distribution of social roles and responsibilities, moral norms and values, or identities. Several types of technology assessment and of scenario studies can be used to anticipate such soft impacts. We argue, however, that these methods do not recognize the dynamic character of morality and its interaction with technology. As a result, they miss an important opportunity to broaden the scope of social and political deliberation on new and emerging technologies.In this paper we outline a framework for building scenarios that enhance the techno-moral imagination by anticipating how technology, morality and their interaction might evolve. To show what kind of product might result from this framework, a scenario is presented as an exemplar. This scenario focuses on developments in biomedical nanotechnology and the moral regime of experimenting with human beings. Finally, the merits and limitations of our framework and the resulting type of scenarios are discussed.

Reframing and Articulating Socio-scientific Classroom Discourses on Genetic Testing from an STS Perspective

“…A very special type of soft impact is that science and technology not only help to realize existing moral values, such as health, sustainability or safety, or conflict with them, but also evoke moral change (Swierstra et al 2009;Boenink et al 2010). A clear relationship between technological and moral change, can be found in the domain of sexual morality.…”

Smart-Glasses: Exposing and Elucidating the Ethical Issues

“…Moreover, the ethical issues identified by this approach are not an end-point for ethical deliberation on smart glasses, but as a starting point for deliberations, decisions, and implementations as well as modifications, negotiations, formation of knowledge, and constitution of moral and social norms and values. Any evolution, constitution, or construction of norms and values (Geels 2005;Boenink et al 2010;Oudshoorn and Pinch 2003) needs to take as a point of departure the present realm of norms and values.…”

The Moral Psychology of Value Sensitive Design: The Methodological Issues of Moral Intuitions for Responsible Innovation

“…The use of heuristics in order to achieve a greater degree of authenticity regarding stakeholder values is but a simple, ad hoc, functional step that can be taken now. Further research projects should look at the viability of moral imagination theories that may be useful in bolstering the value-based investigations that DFV methodologies employ (see Boenink, Swierstra, & Stemerding, 2010;Lucivero et al, 2011;Mahoney & Litz, 2000). Doing so may be fruitful both prior and during the employment of DFV approaches.…”