Hull's goal gradient hypothesis (3, p. 26) states that "... the goal reaction gets conditioned the most strongly to the stimuli preceding it, and the other reactions of the behavior sequence get conditioned to their stimuli progressively weaker as they are more remote {in time or space) 2 from the goal reaction." 8 The applicability of this hypothesis to spatially conditioned behavior sequences has been validated, in part at least, by previous experimental findings (1, 4,10,11). If the principle of a gradient of reinforcement holds in time as well as space, one would predict that a response which has been elicited recurrently at a particular interval of time would tend to be elicited with maximal strength at that interval, and would be elicited in a progressively weaker manner at other points more remote in time from that interval. The present experiment was designed to test this prediction and thereby to secure evidence concerning the applicability of the hypothesis of a gradient of reinforcement to temporally conditioned behavior sequences. 4 The general procedure employed was as follows: rats were trained by being shocked repeatedly at intervals of 12 seconds, the magnitude of their jump-responses to shock being recorded; 1 The author wishes to express appreciation to Drs. O. H. Mowrer, N. E. Miller and D. G. Marquis for valuable suggestions and criticisms. J Italics by the author. * Following the suggestion of Miller and Miles (6), Hull (5) has indicated that since the 'goal' is the point of reinforcement, a better term for 'goal gradient' would be 'gradient of reinforcement.' 4 Since points in time are not, strictly speaking, stimuli to which responses may become conditioned, it is probable that the responses in the above situation become conditioned either to specific segments of relatively stable action patterns occurring sequentially in time (Guthrie, a, pp. 53-55) or to particular sections of hypothetical stimulus traces (Pavlov, 9, p. 43).