Prediction of sub-seismic faults and fractures:Integration of 3D seismic data, 3D retro-deformation, and well data on an example of deformation around an inverted fault
AbstractIn addition to seismically mapped fault structures, a large number of faults below the limit of seismic resolution contribute to sub-surface deformation. However, a correlation between large-and small-scale faults is difficult because of their strong variation in orientation. A workflow to analyse deformation over different scales is described here. Based on the combination of seismic interpretation, coherency analysis, geostatistical analysis, kinematic modelling, and well data analysis, we constrained the density and orientation of sub-seismic faults, and made predictions about reactivation and opening of fractures.We interpreted faults in seismic and coherency volumes at scales between several km and a few tens of meters. 3D retro-deformation was performed on a detailed interpreted 3D structural model to simulate strain in the hanging wall at the time of faulting, at a scale below seismic resolution. The modelling results show that (1) considerable strain is observed more than 1 km away from the fault trace, and (2) deformation around the fault causes strain variations, depending on the fault morphology. This strain variation is responsible for the heterogeneous sub-seismic fracture distribution observed in wells. We linked the fracture density from well data with the modelled strain magnitude, and used the strain magnitude as a proxy for fracture density. With this method we can predict the relative density of small-scale fractures in areas without well data. Furthermore, knowing the orientation of the local strain axis we predict fault strike, and opening or reactivation of fractures during a particular deformation event.