2008
DOI: 10.1161/circoutcomes.108.796185
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anticoagulation Control and Prediction of Adverse Events in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

Abstract: Background-To date, there has been no systematic examination of the relationship between international normalized ratio (INR) control measurements and the prediction of adverse events in patients with atrial fibrillation on oral anticoagulation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
363
2
22

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 476 publications
(406 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
19
363
2
22
Order By: Relevance
“…8 The treatment threshold with vitamin K antagonist may even be lower with good quality anticoagulation control, where a high time in therapeutic range (>70%) is achieved, given that a high time in therapeutic range is associated with best efficacy and safety related to vitamin K antagonists. [22][23][24] All clinical risk scoring systems have broadly comparable predictive value for identifying high-risk patients who sustain stroke events. Rather than a categorized approach to stroke risk stratification focusing on high-risk patients, a simple approach to thromboprophylaxis is to initially identify truly low-risk patients in whom OACs could be clearly omitted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 The treatment threshold with vitamin K antagonist may even be lower with good quality anticoagulation control, where a high time in therapeutic range (>70%) is achieved, given that a high time in therapeutic range is associated with best efficacy and safety related to vitamin K antagonists. [22][23][24] All clinical risk scoring systems have broadly comparable predictive value for identifying high-risk patients who sustain stroke events. Rather than a categorized approach to stroke risk stratification focusing on high-risk patients, a simple approach to thromboprophylaxis is to initially identify truly low-risk patients in whom OACs could be clearly omitted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9.5.3. Chwiejne wartości międzynarodowego wskaźnika znormalizowanego oraz odpowiednie dawkowanie doustnych leków przeciwzakrzepowych niebędących antagonistami witaminy K Ważnym wskaźnikiem predykcyjnym poważnych krwawień jest TTR podczas stosowania VKA [432,441,494]. U pacjentów otrzymujących VKA zaleca się więc dążenie do INR w przedziale 2,0-3,0, utrzymywane dużego TTR (np.…”
Section: Uprzednio Przebyte Krwawienieunclassified
“…460,484 9.5.3 Labile international normalized ratio and adequate non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant dosing TTR on VKA therapy is an important predictor of major haemorrhage. 432,441,494 Therefore, we recommend targeting the INR between 2.0 and 3.0 in patients on VKAs, maintaining a high TTR (e.g. ≥70% 494 ), and to consider switching to a NOAC when a high TTR cannot be sustained.…”
Section: Previous Bleeding Eventmentioning
confidence: 99%