2009
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9947-09-04705-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antidiamond principles and topological applications

Abstract: Abstract. We investigate some combinatorial statements that are strong enough to imply that ♦ fails (hence the name antidiamonds); yet most of them are also compatible with CH. We prove that these axioms have many consequences in set-theoretic topology, including the consistency, modulo large cardinals, of a Yes answer to a problem on linearly Lindelöf spaces posed by Arhangel'skiȋ and Buzyakova (1998).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proof. In a countably tight space, countably compact subspaces are closed [3]. Closed subspaces of a space satisfying the MOP also satisfy it.…”
Section: More Results In a Model Of Pfa(s)[s]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof. In a countably tight space, countably compact subspaces are closed [3]. Closed subspaces of a space satisfying the MOP also satisfy it.…”
Section: More Results In a Model Of Pfa(s)[s]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lemma 5.14 [12]. If X is locally compact, locally connected, and countably tight, then X is a topological sum of Type I spaces if and only if every Lindelöf subspace of X has Lindelöf closure.…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recall a space is ω-bounded if countable sets have compact closures. There are a number of useful variations of ENT; see [7] and [27].…”
Section: 6mentioning
confidence: 99%