2020
DOI: 10.1513/annalsats.201912-880oc
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antifibrotic Drug Use in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Data from the IPF-PRO Registry

Abstract: Rationale: Two antifibrotic medications, nintedanib and pirfenidone, have been approved for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) in the United States. Few data have been published on the use of these medications in clinical practice. Objectives: To investigate patterns of use of antifibrotic medications in the United States. Methods: The Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Prospective Outcomes (IPF-PRO) Registry, a multicenter U.S. registry, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
22
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As discussed in the manuscript, we are in agreement with Dr. White and colleagues that referral to a pulmonary physician (and ideally a multi-disciplinary group including chest radiologists, pulmonary pathologists, rheumatologists, and thoracic surgeons) is critical for the management of a complex disease like IPF and that the observed lack of referrals in our study may have contributed to the lower-than-expected adoption rate. This finding likely also explains the significant difference in adoption found in our analysis and those of various United States IPF registries where involvement of a pulmonary consultant and multi-disciplinary group is an essential component of care (2,3).…”
Section: From the Authorsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…As discussed in the manuscript, we are in agreement with Dr. White and colleagues that referral to a pulmonary physician (and ideally a multi-disciplinary group including chest radiologists, pulmonary pathologists, rheumatologists, and thoracic surgeons) is critical for the management of a complex disease like IPF and that the observed lack of referrals in our study may have contributed to the lower-than-expected adoption rate. This finding likely also explains the significant difference in adoption found in our analysis and those of various United States IPF registries where involvement of a pulmonary consultant and multi-disciplinary group is an essential component of care (2,3).…”
Section: From the Authorsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…20 In practice, however, patients with advanced IPF are commonly treated with nintedanib or pirfenidone, with as many as one in five treated patients having FVC and/or DLCO values below the thresholds for inclusion in trials. 3 Existing insights into the outcomes of such patients have come largely from secondary analyses of clinical trials or from open-label post-authorization studies. In ASCEND, outcomes of patients who experienced a 10% relative decline in FVC during the trial were analysed during a subsequent defined follow-up period, and appeared to have continued benefit from pirfenidone compared to placebo.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among 782 patients in a large US registry, most patients taking an antifibrotic therapy at enrollment were still taking the same therapy approximately 6 months later. 69 …”
Section: Management Of Fibrosing Ildsmentioning
confidence: 99%