We tested 32 Candida isolates recovered in the early 1990s from the bloodstreams of patients with candidemia for in vitro susceptibility to fluconazole and determined if MIC and/or the daily dose of fluconazole/MIC ratio correlated with the response to therapy. This is a unique data set since 87.5% (28/32) of patients were treated with fluconazole doses now considered to be inadequate (<200 mg), which contributed to high therapeutic failure rates (53% [17/32]). The geometric mean MIC and dose/MIC ratio for isolates associated with therapeutic failure (11.55 g/ml and 14.3, respectively) differed significantly from values associated with therapeutic success (0.95 g/ml and 219.36 [P ؍ 0.0009 and 0.0004, respectively]). The therapeutic success rates among patients infected with susceptible (MIC < 8 g/ml), susceptible-dose dependent (S-DD) (MIC ؍ 16 or 32 g/ml), and resistant (MIC > 64 g/ml) isolates were 67% (14/21), 20% (1/5), and 0% (0/6), respectively. A dose/MIC ratio >50 was associated with a success rate of 74% (14/19), compared to 8% (1/13) for a dose/MIC ratio <50 (P ؍ 0.0003). Our data suggest that both fluconazole MIC and dose/MIC ratio correlate with the therapeutic response to fluconazole among patients with candidemia. In clinical practice, dose/MIC ratio might prove easier to interpret than breakpoint MICs, since it quantitates the effects of increasing fluconazole doses that are alluded to in the S-DD designation.Candida spp. emerged as common causes of mucosal and systemic diseases with the onset of the AIDS epidemic and increasing populations of immunosuppressed individuals (18). The introduction of fluconazole revolutionized the therapy of candidal infections in the 1990s by offering a well-tolerated alternative to amphotericin B, the long-standing and significantly toxic antifungal of choice (23). Despite the recent development of newer antifungal drugs, fluconazole remains an attractive front-line agent against candidiasis because of its excellent oral bioavailability and overall clinical efficacy.The increasing importance of candidal infections created the need for reliable methods of testing clinical isolates for susceptibility to fluconazole and other antifungal agents. After 15 years of collaborative research, the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) approved a standardized reference method for testing of yeasts that demonstrated excellent intra-and interlaboratory reproducibility (17). With this method, the NCCLS proposed interpretive breakpoint MICs of fluconazole that correlated with the response to therapy in vivo, largely based upon the experience in treating human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients with oropharyngeal candidiasis caused by Candida albicans (27). Since their publication, the NCCLS interpretative breakpoints have been supported by further data on oropharyngeal candidiasis (5-7, 21, 22, 25, 30, 34). A correlation between in vitro susceptibility and the response to therapy of nonmucosal candidiasis has been demonstrated in some studi...