Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd007287.pub2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antigen-specific active immunotherapy for ovarian cancer

Abstract: We conclude that despite promising immunological responses no clinically effective antigen-specific active immunotherapy is yet available for ovarian cancer. Furthermore, the adoption of guidelines to ensure uniformity in trial conduct, response definitions and trial reporting is recommended to improve quality and comparability of immunotherapy trials.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Various targeted strategies have been evaluated for OC management [1, 4, 5] and many molecules are under investigation, among which agents to block growth factor receptors, such as monoclonal antibodies (MAbs), or tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), anti-angiogenetic molecules and DNA repair inhibitors, such as Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors such olaparib (for review see [5]). However, these molecules only provide short-term survival improvement [6] and more effective treatments to address chemo-resistant recurrent OC are not available yet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Various targeted strategies have been evaluated for OC management [1, 4, 5] and many molecules are under investigation, among which agents to block growth factor receptors, such as monoclonal antibodies (MAbs), or tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), anti-angiogenetic molecules and DNA repair inhibitors, such as Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors such olaparib (for review see [5]). However, these molecules only provide short-term survival improvement [6] and more effective treatments to address chemo-resistant recurrent OC are not available yet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, OC heterogeneity also complicates the targeted treatment strategies. The molecules evaluated in clinical trials do not seem to be clinically effective and with low toxicity in OCs [4]. Recently, in phase 2 trials, eight targeted drugs (gefitinib, imatinib, sorafenib, temsirolimus, mifepristone, enzastaurine, lapatinib and vorinostat) have produced objective response rates of less than 10% and stabilized the disease for six months in less than 25% of patients [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although antibody approaches have been successful in other epithelial carcinomas, especially those of breast and colon, no such efficacy has yet been clearly demonstrated in OC. Nonetheless, the best evidence for immune efficacy in OC is with anti-CA- 125 antibodies, yet even in this approach, little clinical benefit is seen despite successful induction of significant immune responses [56].…”
Section: Anti-cd64mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preclinical and preliminary clinical studies aimed at proving the immunotherapy concept in EOC were initiated by using monoclonal Ab (mAb), vaccinations or adoptive T-cell transferts [113-115]. The majority of these studies were uncontrolled phase I/II studies, with small sample sizes and heterogeneous inclusion criteria (recurrent or chemotherapy-refractory diseases) disrupting the comparisons and the identification of the best strategy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All these mAb demonstrated adequate safety and tolerability but failed to demonstrate clear clinical benefits, even when an immunological response was evidenced [114,115]. Active immunotherapy by vaccination based on peptides or cellular approaches were also evaluated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%