2004
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.42.5.2351-2352.2004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antigenic Cross-Reactivity between the Nucleocapsid Protein of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) Coronavirus and Polyclonal Antisera of Antigenic Group I Animal Coronaviruses: Implication for SARS Diagnosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

3
70
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
70
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In this respect, a further study of those samples with the new Western blot analysis may provide useful information and thus warrant further investigation. Interestingly, our findings here also echoed a very recent report of the cross-reactivity of the N protein of SARS-CoV to antigenic group I animal CoVs (17). It is perhaps also noteworthy that the cross-reactivity could in theory be eliminated by reducing the amount of the N protein used for the production of the immunoblot, since there was a consistent difference in the protein band intensities between the SARS samples and the controls (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this respect, a further study of those samples with the new Western blot analysis may provide useful information and thus warrant further investigation. Interestingly, our findings here also echoed a very recent report of the cross-reactivity of the N protein of SARS-CoV to antigenic group I animal CoVs (17). It is perhaps also noteworthy that the cross-reactivity could in theory be eliminated by reducing the amount of the N protein used for the production of the immunoblot, since there was a consistent difference in the protein band intensities between the SARS samples and the controls (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…As a result, a test with the new Western immunoblot will be considered positive only if the lysate N protein and at least one of the other criterion proteins were detected simultaneously. This prerequisite of multiple markers in combinations limited the possible impact of the cross-reactivity of the N proteins observed here and elsewhere (17) without compromising the sensitivity of the immunoblot and thus provided an advantage over some currently available tests that relied on only a single N protein.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the N proteins of the known coronaviruses are relatively conserved, the expressed N protein of the SARS-CoV in Escherichia coli cross-reacts with polyclonal antisera of some known animal coronaviruses in antigenic group I, including transmissible gastroenteritis virus, feline infectious peritonitis virus, and canine coronavirus (9), which raised concerns of potential false positives when the recombinant N protein of the SARS-CoV, whole-virus antigen extracts, or virus-infected cells are used as reagents. However, this concern is very minimal, since the two known human coronaviruses (strains 229E and OC43) do not cause severe clinical diseases and we still do not have data about the prevalence of the antibodies to other coronaviruses or relevant microorganisms in human populations (4,6,8).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the SARS-N protein shares low homology (approximately 20-30%) with N proteins of other HCoVs, a previous report has described that the SARS-N protein has strong crossreactivity with sera against HCoVs (Sun and Meng, 2004). Hence, anti-sera against SARS-CoV may be cross-reactive with other HCoVs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%