1950
DOI: 10.1001/jama.1950.02910400013004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antihistaminic Agents and Ascorbic Acid in the Early Treatment of the Common Cold

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1950
1950
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We excluded 351 unqualified trials on the basis of titles and abstracts, and then 31 trials were excluded because of inappropriate contrast, while 32 were excluded for the assessment of prophylactic effect or other reasons. Finally, 9 articles [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37] fulfilled our eligibility criteria after manual search and a review of full manuscripts. The study selection procedure is outlined in Figure 1.…”
Section: Study Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We excluded 351 unqualified trials on the basis of titles and abstracts, and then 31 trials were excluded because of inappropriate contrast, while 32 were excluded for the assessment of prophylactic effect or other reasons. Finally, 9 articles [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37] fulfilled our eligibility criteria after manual search and a review of full manuscripts. The study selection procedure is outlined in Figure 1.…”
Section: Study Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Karlowski et al (22) and Anderson et al (13,35) found that the estimates derived from regular supplementation do not overestimate the benefit of a 5-day therapeutic regime (7), suggesting that the estimates in Figure 1 may crudely apply to appropriate therapeutic supplementation. A few other trials have examined the role of therapeutic regimes, some reporting benefit from vitamin C (36-38), while some others found no effect (37)(38)(39)(40).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the therapeutic trials, however, both a delay in the initiation of the treatment, and an inappropriately short treatment period might decrease the benefit. The former effect was observed in one of the therapeutic trials (36), and the latter effect may explain the inefficacy of vitamin C in three therapeutic trials in which supplementation lasted for only 2-3 days while the mean duration of cold episodes was 5-8 days (37)(38)(39). Finally, it is noteworthy that none of the published therapeutic trials used children as subjects, whereas the regular supplementation studies have on average found a considerably greater benefit for children ( Table 1, Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Megadoses of vitamin C (3 g/d) have been shown to prevent cold and flu symptoms in students 18-30 y of age [11]. Lower doses of vitamin C have not been shown to prevent cold symptoms in a number of trials [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. Doses of vitamin C in excess of 1 g/d taken shortly after onset of a cold symptom did not decrease the duration or severity of cold symptoms in healthy adult volunteers when compared with a vitamin C dose lower than the minimum recommended daily intake [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%