2006 IEEE International Conference on Communications 2006
DOI: 10.1109/icc.2006.255484
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antijamming Capacity and Performance Analysis of Multiple Access Spread Spectrum Systems in AWGN and Fading Environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When frequency repetition is present in the system, full-band jamming causes more damage than partial-band jamming, and a jammer optimizing its parameters using the bound will switch from a full-time, full-band jamming strategy to a partial-time, full-band jamming strategy as the K-factor of the channel increases. This result is consistent with research on fast frequency-hopped spread-spectrum systems, such as [12] and [16], and is consistent with results in [8], where frequency repetition is always used.…”
Section: ) Theoretical Results and Simulation Results Comparisonsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…When frequency repetition is present in the system, full-band jamming causes more damage than partial-band jamming, and a jammer optimizing its parameters using the bound will switch from a full-time, full-band jamming strategy to a partial-time, full-band jamming strategy as the K-factor of the channel increases. This result is consistent with research on fast frequency-hopped spread-spectrum systems, such as [12] and [16], and is consistent with results in [8], where frequency repetition is always used.…”
Section: ) Theoretical Results and Simulation Results Comparisonsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The jamming signal, denoted by J(t), is a stationary zero mean complex Gaussian process active on a fraction ρ of the signal bandwidth. The assumption of Gaussian jamming signal is considered in several articles as [5][6][7].…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%