2015
DOI: 10.1166/jctn.2015.4138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antimalarial Artemisinins Derivatives Study: Molecular Modeling and Multivariate Analysis (PCA, HCA, KNN, SIMCA and SDA)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the frequencies were also calculated using B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p) and observed that there were no negative frequencies, thereby ensuring that local minimum energy structure [60]. The phenylbutazone derivatives and therapeutic targets structures for molecular docking study were prepared using the software Discovery Studio 5.0 (San Diego, CA, USA) [61], removing the water molecules and for docking validations were downloaded with the therapeutic targets crystal structures and crystallographic inhibitors were used in molecular docking study, as well as, in validation through of the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) value between the experimental data with computational data, according to studies carried out by Macêdo et al (2015) [62] and Federico et al (2017) [63].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the frequencies were also calculated using B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p) and observed that there were no negative frequencies, thereby ensuring that local minimum energy structure [60]. The phenylbutazone derivatives and therapeutic targets structures for molecular docking study were prepared using the software Discovery Studio 5.0 (San Diego, CA, USA) [61], removing the water molecules and for docking validations were downloaded with the therapeutic targets crystal structures and crystallographic inhibitors were used in molecular docking study, as well as, in validation through of the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) value between the experimental data with computational data, according to studies carried out by Macêdo et al (2015) [62] and Federico et al (2017) [63].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to literature, the binding mode prediction using docking should present root mean square deviation (RMSD) value <2.0 Å when superimposed to the crystallographic pose of the ligand [46][47][48]. So, the search parameters were suitable for the docking step and the accuracy of the docking study was corroborated/validated by the crystallographic pose of the agonist into the A 2A AR active site, reinforcing the reliability of our computational protocol to search for new potential leads or hits [23,30].…”
Section: Molecular Docking Studiesmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…According to the statistical quality (regression parameters), the best model constructed is shown in Equation 3 [29], the F value is found to be statistically significant at 95.00% level, since the entire value of F calculated is higher when compared to tabulated values. By Costa [30], a higher F value implies a more significant correlation was achieved. This combination of molar volume (MV), molar polarizability (MP), number of atoms (NA), pharmacophore features (PF), and hydrophobic group (HG) showed relevant statistics (r = 0.9634) and explained up to 89.22% of the variance of r 2 A .…”
Section: Pentaparametric Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After selection it was necessary to optimize the structures, since the use of conformations that are not bioactive or pharmacophoric conformations, in conformationally flexible molecules can lead to errors in the interaction models and to solve the problem the structures were redesigned and optimized in the program HyperChem 7.1 [22,23]. The method selected was Molecular Mechanics with the MM + force field [24], which is faster and simpler than the semi-empirical method because the structures in question being polypeptides, have relatively large sizes and thus require time and increase the number of computational cycles required to calculate the energy of the molecule [25]. Molecular mechanics (MM) calculations are force field calculations using gradient lowering methods for geometry optimization, which generally leads to more stable conformation, but not of the least energy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%