2021
DOI: 10.2147/aabc.s323657
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antimicrobial Activity, in silico Molecular Docking, ADMET and DFT Analysis of Secondary Metabolites from Roots of Three Ethiopian Medicinal Plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Auto Grid generated these maps before the docking run. The interaction energy between the ligand atom and the receptor was calculated for the entire binding site, which is discretized using a grid for each ligand atom type (Anza et al, 2021; Lončarić et al, 2020). The binding affinity of the ligands was calculated, and the docked poses were observed using Pymol software ver 1.7.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Auto Grid generated these maps before the docking run. The interaction energy between the ligand atom and the receptor was calculated for the entire binding site, which is discretized using a grid for each ligand atom type (Anza et al, 2021; Lončarić et al, 2020). The binding affinity of the ligands was calculated, and the docked poses were observed using Pymol software ver 1.7.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, a large energy gap increases the global hardness of compounds as follows: Ia>Ib>IIa>IIb, and their chemical reactivity decrease in the reverse order: Ia<Ib<IIa<IIb [28]. These results show that all compounds exhibit a low energy gap, suggesting a significant intramolecular charge from HOMO to LUMO groups and high chemical reactivity [29,30]. Besides, like electronegativity and hardness, the electrophilicity index ω, as an indicator of reactivity, measures the stabilization energy when the system acquires an additional electronic charge [31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The Molecular Docking on perfluorinated derivatives Ia-b and IIa-b against Human DNA Topoisomerase II α (PDB ID 3QX3) indicates that compounds Ib, and IIa-b show a strong binding affinity towards the mentioned target (Table 5) with binding energy values ranging from -8.1 to -10.0 Kcal/mol compared to vosaroxin (−6.2 kcal/mol) [29]. S-(perfluoro-[1, 1'-biphenyl]-4-yl)-L-cysteine (IIa) and S-(perfluoro-[1, 1'-biphenyl]-4-yl)-L-glutathione (IIb) present the higher binding affinity -9.5 and 10.0 Kcal/mol.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Classes I, II, and III have less toxicity, whereas Class IV displays no toxicity [57]. Moreover, PROTOX is a rodent oral toxicity server that is used to determine LD50 values and toxicity classes of potentially cytotoxic agents [58]. Based on the molecular docking drug-likeness data and toxicity data, phytoconstituents were selected for further MD simulation analysis.…”
Section: Toxicity Prediction Of F Vulgare Phytoconstituents By Protox...mentioning
confidence: 99%