2014
DOI: 10.1128/aac.02429-13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antimicrobial Activity of Ceftazidime-Avibactam against Gram-Negative Organisms Collected from U.S. Medical Centers in 2012

Abstract: The activities of the novel ␤-lactam-␤-lactamase inhibitor combination ceftazidime-avibactam and comparator agents were evaluated against a contemporary collection of clinically significant Gram-negative bacilli. Avibactam is a novel non-␤-lactam ␤-lactamase inhibitor that inhibits Ambler class A, C, and some D enzymes. A total of 10,928 Gram-negative bacilli-8,640 Enterobacteriaceae, 1,967 Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and 321 Acinetobacter sp. isolates-were collected from 73 U.S. hospitals and tested for susceptib… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
72
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
6
72
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…At the same time, it is notable that 24% (17/72) of the strains exhibited MICs within two 2-fold dilutions of the CLSI breakpoint and would be classified as ceftazidime nonsusceptible by EUCAST criteria (susceptible MIC, Յ1 g/ml) (11). Previous studies have demonstrated higher ceftazidime-avibactam MICs against CRE-and ESBL-expressing strains than against susceptible strains (1,12). Taken together, those data and ours provide important cautionary notes as clinicians begin to integrate the use of ceftazidime-avibactam into clinical practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…At the same time, it is notable that 24% (17/72) of the strains exhibited MICs within two 2-fold dilutions of the CLSI breakpoint and would be classified as ceftazidime nonsusceptible by EUCAST criteria (susceptible MIC, Յ1 g/ml) (11). Previous studies have demonstrated higher ceftazidime-avibactam MICs against CRE-and ESBL-expressing strains than against susceptible strains (1,12). Taken together, those data and ours provide important cautionary notes as clinicians begin to integrate the use of ceftazidime-avibactam into clinical practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Moreover, several new cephalosporin-␤-lactamase-inhibitor combinational products in clinical trials (e.g., ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftaroline-avibactam, and ceftolozane-tazobactam) (944) are still likely to be the substrates of RND pumps, as are other ␤-lactams and ␤-lactamase inhibitors (13,390,439,545), because avibactam cannot reverse efflux-mediated ceftazidime resistance (956), and both ceftaroline and ceftolozane (a new antipseudomonal cephalosporin) are still affected by efflux pump-and/or porin-related resistance mechanisms (although ceftolozane, containing multiple charged groups, appears less impacted by Mex pumps than many other ␤-lactams and did not select in vitro for pump overproducers in P. aeruginosa, unlike other agents) (417,(957)(958)(959). These observations could also illustrate their reduced or lack of synergistic activity against multidrug-resistant A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa (960)(961)(962). Additionally, a target-based inhibitor of LpxC (a metalloamidase involved in LPS biosynthesis), CHIR-090, is also a substrate for MexAB-OprM, MexCDOprJ, and MexEF-OprN (963).…”
Section: Multidrug Efflux Pumps As a Challenge In Drug Developmentmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The MIC 50 /MIC 90 of this agent for ESBL-producing E. coli and K. pneumoniae are 0.12/0.25 µg/mL and 0.5/1 µg/mL, respectively [60]. Similar to ceftolozane-tazobactam, phase 2 [61] and phase 3 studies [62] compared ceftazidime-avibactam (plus metronidazole) vs meropenem for intra-abdominal infections, but did not specifically compare outcomes of ESBL-confirmed pathogens.…”
Section: Newer β-Lactam-β-lactamase Inhibitorsmentioning
confidence: 99%