2010
DOI: 10.1128/aem.00445-10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antimicrobial Activity of Simulated Solar Disinfection against Bacterial, Fungal, and Protozoan Pathogens and Its Enhancement by Riboflavin

Abstract: Riboflavin significantly enhanced the efficacy of simulated solar disinfection (SODIS) at 150 watts per square meter (W m ؊2 ) against a variety of microorganisms, including Escherichia coli, Fusarium solani, Candida albicans, and Acanthamoeba polyphaga trophozoites (>3 to 4 log 10 after 2 to 6 h; P < 0.001). With A. polyphaga cysts, the kill (3.5 log 10 after 6 h) was obtained only in the presence of riboflavin and 250 W m ؊2 irradiance.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
27
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
27
1
Order By: Relevance
“…10 Another promising approach, which is potentially less complicated and less harmful than PDT, is use of ultraviolet (UV) [11][12][13][14][15][16][17] or visible (VIS) incoherent light. [18][19][20] Although the application of the UV or VIS light in therapy seems promising, and deserves an intensive investigation, far less effort has been put into research following this approach in comparison with PDT. Moreover, the published results of such investigations are often more qualitative than quantitative, and, therefore, of limited practical therapeutic value.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 Another promising approach, which is potentially less complicated and less harmful than PDT, is use of ultraviolet (UV) [11][12][13][14][15][16][17] or visible (VIS) incoherent light. [18][19][20] Although the application of the UV or VIS light in therapy seems promising, and deserves an intensive investigation, far less effort has been put into research following this approach in comparison with PDT. Moreover, the published results of such investigations are often more qualitative than quantitative, and, therefore, of limited practical therapeutic value.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13,14 This form of disinfection is more than 1,000-fold slower than direct damage of UV-C. 15 Several researchers have looked for means to accelerate SODIS, using such compounds as riboflavin, TiO 2 , H 2 O 2 , and copper plus ascorbic acid. [16][17][18][19][20][21] Many of these compounds have photoactivity in the UV-A spectrum, thereby enhancing normally inefficient insults of UV-A against microorganisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the microorganisms tested are Poliovirus Type II, Bacillus subtilis, Campylobacter jejuni, Escherichia coli, Legionella pneumophila, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella thyphimurium, Shigella dysenteriae, Staphylococcus aureus, Vibrio cholerae, Yersinia enterocolitica, Candida albicans, Fusarium solani, Acanthamoeba spp., Cryptosporidium parvum, Entamoeba invadens, Naegleria gruberi, Giardia spp., and Ascaris suum. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12] Moreover, studies of the impact on health of the use of SODIS have shown a significant decrease in the risk of diarrheal diseases among users of the technique (26-75%). [13][14][15][16][17] Thus, SODIS effectively improves the microbial quality of drinking water for preventing diarrhea.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%