2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2015.06.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antimicrobial an antioxidant activity of selected Polish herbhoneys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other cases, there were no such direct interconnections; for example, sunflower honey, with the lowest antioxidant capacity (Table 2), demonstrated high antibacterial activity (Tables 4 and 5). Similar results were obtained by Isidorov et al (2015) and by Lukasiewicz et al (2015). These results suggest that the antimicrobial activities of different monofloral honeys are mainly dependent on plant source.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In other cases, there were no such direct interconnections; for example, sunflower honey, with the lowest antioxidant capacity (Table 2), demonstrated high antibacterial activity (Tables 4 and 5). Similar results were obtained by Isidorov et al (2015) and by Lukasiewicz et al (2015). These results suggest that the antimicrobial activities of different monofloral honeys are mainly dependent on plant source.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Glucose oxidase (GO) activity was determined based on the H 2 O 2 detection method developed by Mottola et al (1970) and modified by Lukasiewicz et al (2015). Total phenolic content was measured using the Folin-Ciocalteu reagent (Meda et al 2005).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, they had the highest activity in concentrations of 5-50% against the most sensitive bacteria (E. coli and P. myxofaciens). Against E. coli for acacia honey in concentrations of 5 and 50%, the inhibition zone diameter varied from 22.0 ± 1.0 to 31.6 ± 0.6 mm, respectively, while honeydew honey showed inhibition ranging from 20.6 ± 1.2 to 30.3 ± 1.5 mm (52). The present study (Table 4) showed that honeydew honey was twice more potent against E. coli (MIC = 12.5% w/w) in comparison to acacia honey (MIC = 25.0% w/w).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%