2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.micpath.2020.104271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antimicrobial and antiadhesive effects of Lactobacillus isolates of healthy human gut origin on Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) and Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli (EAEC)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a study by Sirichokchatchawan et al [16], the strain L. plantarum showed antagonistic activity against Escherichia coli; an inhibition zone diameter of 6.00-9.00 mm was considered to indicate weak inhibition (+), 10.00-13.00 mm was considered intermediate inhibition (++), 14.00-16.00 mm was considered strong inhibition (+++), and 17.00 mm or more was considered very strong inhibition (++++) by the agar well diffusion method (including the hole puncher, 6.00 mm). Pazhoohan et al [33] reported that Lactobacillus showed antagonistic activity against ETEC with an inhibition zone diameter of 27.00 mm by the same method. Wang et al [20] screened the strain L. plantarum subsp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In a study by Sirichokchatchawan et al [16], the strain L. plantarum showed antagonistic activity against Escherichia coli; an inhibition zone diameter of 6.00-9.00 mm was considered to indicate weak inhibition (+), 10.00-13.00 mm was considered intermediate inhibition (++), 14.00-16.00 mm was considered strong inhibition (+++), and 17.00 mm or more was considered very strong inhibition (++++) by the agar well diffusion method (including the hole puncher, 6.00 mm). Pazhoohan et al [33] reported that Lactobacillus showed antagonistic activity against ETEC with an inhibition zone diameter of 27.00 mm by the same method. Wang et al [20] screened the strain L. plantarum subsp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Amarantini, Budiarso, Antika, and Prakasita (2020) and Divyashree, Anjali, Somashekaraiah, and Sreenivasa (2021) indicated that L. plantarum isolated from different fermented foods presented antimicrobial activity against Salmonella species, which could be useful to prevent and treat food-borne illnesses. Likewise, other authors reported that L. plantarum strains highly inhibited E. coli protecting against the development of diarrhea and maintain a healthy gastrointestinal tract (Ali, Shyum Naqvi, & Yousuf, 2020;Pazhoohan, Sadeghi, Moghadami, Soltanmoradi, & Davoodabadi, 2020). In this case, to ensure that L. plantarum K16 can protect against pathogenic bacteria, more research is needed.…”
Section: Antimicrobial Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, with the emergence of antibioticresistant pathogens, novel alternative treatment and prevention strategies for ETEC infections are being investigated. Probiotics, in particular, were considered to be one of the most promising countermeasures [7,8]. Existing studies have indicated that probiotics exert antidiarrheal efects through complex anti-infective mechanisms, such as regulation of intestinal microbiota and modulation of the host immune system [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%