2016
DOI: 10.4317/jced.52493
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antimicrobial effects of Citrus sinensis peel extracts against dental caries bacteria: An in vitro study

Abstract: BackgroundEthnomedicine is gaining admiration since years but still there is abundant medicinal flora which is unrevealed through research. The study was conducted to assess the in vitro antimicrobial potential and also determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of Citrus sinensis peel extracts with a view of searching a novel extract as a remedy for dental caries pathogens.Material and MethodsAqueous and ethanol (cold and hot) extracts prepared from peel of Citrus sinensis were screened for in vitro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
52
0
6

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
52
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, both the bacteria S. aureus CCTCC AB9105 (MIC 100 μg mL −1 ) and E. coli CCTCC AB94014 (MIC 400 μg mL −1 ) were reported to be highly susceptible to the 80% ethanol extract of Pericarpium Citri Reticulatae . The MIC of ethanolic extracts of Citrus sinensis peel against varieties of dental caries pathogens were between 11.5 and 12.5 mg mL −1 , versus 0.16–2.50 mg mL −1 in our present report. The difference in antibacterial activity between them could be due to variation in chemical composition and their penetration ability through the cell membrane of bacterial pathogens .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Similarly, both the bacteria S. aureus CCTCC AB9105 (MIC 100 μg mL −1 ) and E. coli CCTCC AB94014 (MIC 400 μg mL −1 ) were reported to be highly susceptible to the 80% ethanol extract of Pericarpium Citri Reticulatae . The MIC of ethanolic extracts of Citrus sinensis peel against varieties of dental caries pathogens were between 11.5 and 12.5 mg mL −1 , versus 0.16–2.50 mg mL −1 in our present report. The difference in antibacterial activity between them could be due to variation in chemical composition and their penetration ability through the cell membrane of bacterial pathogens .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The TVC for the zein‐treated sample was higher than the limit on the last day of storage, but the TVCs for CzVEeEm, CzVEe, and CzVEm treatments remained below the limit up to the last day of storage. This can be linked to the antibacterial characteristics of the zein coating and the sour orange peel extract …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This can be linked to the antibacterial characteristics of the zein coating and the sour orange peel extract. 46 Psychrotrophic bacteria (PTC) are the main group of bacteria responsible for the spoilage of aerobically kept fresh fish meat. 47 The initial rate of PTC in the control sample was 5.17 ± 0.18 CFU g -1 , which was higher than for other treatments, which may be related to the rapid antimicrobial influence of the zein coating as a result of its alcoholic nature and of the sour orange peel extracts.…”
Section: Microbiological Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such kind of natural immunostimulants are medicinal plants, among these C. limon , and citrus plants in general, have long been used to treat many diseases in traditional medicine such as obesity, diabetes, hypercholesterolaemia, high blood pressure, inflammation (Padilla‐Camberos et al, ; Park et al, ; Parra et al, ; Tort, ), brain disorders, cancer (Lim et al, ; Parra et al, ; Shetty et al, ; Tort, ), microbial infections (Ou et al, ; Park et al, ; Shetty et al, ), digestive disorders (Padilla‐Camberos et al, ; Park et al, ; Shetty et al, ), vitamin deficiencies (Shetty et al, ) and bronchial, asthmatic and degenerative diseases (Lim et al, ) among others. In general, the different parts of citrus plants have beneficial properties, for example immune‐enhancing (Padilla‐Camberos et al, ; Shetty et al, ) and anti‐toxic (Chowdhury et al, ), and present antioxidant (Cho et al, ; Gómez et al, ; Nouri & Shafaghatlonbar, ; Ou et al, ; Padilla‐Camberos et al, ; Wu et al, ), antibacterial (Ou et al, ; Ramadan et al, ; Shetty et al, ), anti‐diabetic (Menichini et al, ; Padilla‐Camberos et al, ; Wu et al, ), anti‐inflammatory (Ramadan et al, ), hepato‐protective (Chowdhury et al, ), neuro‐protective (Ramadan et al, ) and kidney‐protective (Sridharan et al, ) activities due to the phenolic compounds they contain, such as terpenes (Nakajima et al, ; Ou et al, ; Park, Lee, & Park, ; Park et al, ; Shetty et al, ) phenolic acids (Ou et al, ; Park et al, ; Shetty et al, ) and flavonoids (Gómez et al, ; Lee et al, ; Lim et al, ; Nakajima et al, ; Okuyama & Zasshi, ; Park et al, ; Shetty et al, ; Wu et al, ). For these important reasons it was decided to test the effects of this important fruit on gilthead seabream, as on...…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%