“…In total, 12 full-text articles were read thoroughly according to the inclusion criteria from the other method reference folder, and the remaining 18 studies that met the eligibility criteria adequately were from the main databases; no study from the “other method reference” folder was included. The final 18 studies were included in the qualitative analysis ( Abbaszadegan et al, 2016 , Athiban et al, 2012 , Babaji et al, 2016 , Bazvand et al, 2014 , Bhardwaj et al, 2012 , Ehsani et al, 2013 , Eskandarinezhad et al, 2022 , Ghasemi et al, 2020 , Goud et al, 2018 , Ismail et al, 2020 , Karkare et al, 2015 , Noushad et al, 2017 , Ramamurthy et al, 2017 , Sahebi et al, 2014 , Sailaja et al, 2020 , Valera et al, 2013 , Vasudeva et al, 2017 , Vinothkumar et al, 2013 ), and nine studies were included in the meta -analysis ( Bazvand et al, 2014 , Bhardwaj et al, 2012 , Eskandarinezhad et al, 2022 , Ghasemi et al, 2020 , Goud et al, 2018 , Sahebi et al, 2014 , Sailaja et al, 2020 , Valera et al, 2013 , Vasudeva et al, 2017 ). The agreement between reviewers was evaluated with the support of statistics ( Landis and Koch, 1977 ), which showed a high agreement (0.75) among them.…”