Background Mouthwashes, as a form of antimicrobial delivery system,
rank among the safest and most effective vehicles, particularly in the case
of young children. This is attributed to their ability to distribute
therapeutic components across all accessible oral surfaces, including
interproximal areas.
Objective To evaluate the antibacterial efficacy of recently
introduced Ayurvedic (Hiora) and triclosan-based mouthwashes among
children.
Materials and Methods A total of 45 healthy children aged 10–15 years
were randomly assigned to three groups: Herbal mouthwash (Hiora),
triclosan-based mouthwash (Kidodent), and normal saline as the control
group. Saliva samples were collected pre-rinse, 2 minutes, 30 minutes, and
60 minutes post-rinsing with the study mouthwashes. These samples were then
inoculated onto Petri dishes containing blood agar culture media, followed
by incubation under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions at 37°C for
48 hours. The resulting bacterial colonies of Streptococcus spp. and
Lactobacillus spp. were counted (CFU/ml x 105). Statistical
analysis, including ANOVA, Newman Keul’s Post-hoc test, and a two-tailed ‘t’
test, was conducted to determine the significance of the results.
Results The Ayurvedic Hiora mouthwash demonstrated the most
substantial reduction in salivary bacterial colony counts of
Streptococcus spp. and Lactobacillus spp. with
statistically significant results (p<0.01).
Conclusion The Ayurvedic Hiora mouthwash exhibited the highest
antibacterial effectiveness, followed by the triclosan-based mouthwash in
decreasing order, with saline showing the least efficacy.