2022
DOI: 10.3390/jfb13030136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antimicrobial Fibrous Bandage-like Scaffolds Using Clove Bud Oil

Abstract: Wounds are characterised by an anatomical disruption of the skin; this leaves the body exposed to opportunistic pathogens which contribute to infections. Current wound healing bandages do little to protect against this and when they do, they can often utilise harmful additions. Historically, plant-based constituents have been extensively used for wound treatment and are proven beneficial in such environments. In this work, the essential oil of clove bud (Syzygium aromaticum) was incorporated in a polycaprolact… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 51 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To evaluate the in vitro antimicrobial activity of the dressings disk diffusion testing, a common, inexpensive and simple method to determine antibacterial effects, was performed. 45,46 However, this qualitative test registers only antimicrobial materials that contain a diffusible compound and does not yield quantitative assessment. Additional complicating factors imply the visual reading and partially indistinct inhibition zones leading to poor reproducibility of the results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the in vitro antimicrobial activity of the dressings disk diffusion testing, a common, inexpensive and simple method to determine antibacterial effects, was performed. 45,46 However, this qualitative test registers only antimicrobial materials that contain a diffusible compound and does not yield quantitative assessment. Additional complicating factors imply the visual reading and partially indistinct inhibition zones leading to poor reproducibility of the results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%